From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryan Underwood Subject: Re: win3.1 attempts :) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 23:52:39 -0500 Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20030924045239.GB15562@dbz.icequake.net> References: <3F707DF4.6070500@aknet.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F707DF4.6070500@aknet.ru> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:08:04PM +0400, Stas Sergeev wrote: > > The harm is a waste of time only. > And btw, this was not a shot in the dark. > As both that windows (3.1 and wfwg) are > using a standard mode during the install, > replacing the dosx.exe was the most > obvious thing it seems. Maybe obvious to someone who knew they are using standard mode during the install only. :P I thought WFW3.11 had _no_ standard mode whatsoever. > >>Just look into "Help->About" in a Program Manager to find out. > >To do that, one would need a working installation, which you have > Not any more. I just tried the installation > under a real DOS (to see about the "filesystem > problems"), and, as I am half asleep after > work, I ocasionally deleted it instead of > the directory created during that test install. Damn! Well, I suppose I'll get to be the one to look into this problem further. Later, -- Ryan Underwood, , icq=10317253