From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryan Underwood Subject: Re: no MIDI input with dosemu ? Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 02:31:47 -0600 Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040109083147.GA32017@dbz.icequake.net> References: <3FFD60BF.2070007@aknet.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FFD60BF.2070007@aknet.ru> List-Id: To: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 04:53:03PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote: > Why? Implementing midi input is trivial, > but I'm puzzled as of what's the use. > Dosemu needs a MIDI output as otherwise > you can't play games. But as for midi > recording, you can use the native Linux > programs just fine. And it will actually > work better, because under dosemu the > timing is not always accurate. So why > would anyone ever need that? On a slightly different topic, do you think DOSEMU would benefit at all =66rom realtime scheduling support? Especially on slower 386/486 machines because we don't have pentium TSC; but also to keep multitasking from interfering too much with operation of a DOS program that doesn't expect to be paused for any great length of time. --=20 Ryan Underwood, --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE//mbzIonHnh+67jkRAtwlAJ99lqgSYc/M9DFfh48Xu2Gag82pTQCeJrrm 8VvEBXAlkgVl33u8WTe8UD0= =yVMp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK--