From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryan Underwood Subject: Re: Can I use DOSEMU for testing device driver code? Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 01:52:33 -0600 Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040217075233.GB12169@dbz.icequake.net> References: <402E19FA.1050704@edenyard.co.uk> <20040215045827.GB20725@dbz.icequake.net> <4030A922.5040306@edenyard.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4030A922.5040306@edenyard.co.uk> List-Id: To: Edenyard Cc: Ryan Underwood , linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 11:27:30AM +0000, Edenyard wrote: > Ryan Underwood wrote: >=20 > >First use setserial to disable Linux's > >use of the port though. >=20 > Reading the man page for setserial, it seems that the way to disable > the port (/dev/ttyS0) is: 'setserial /dev/ttyS0 uart none'. Is that=20 > correct? When I try that (as root), although it doesn't issue any error > message, it doesn't disable /dev/ttyS0 either. When I subsequently do > 'setserial /dev/ttyS0' to check, it merely says that the UART is > unknown, but that ttyS0 is STILL using IRQ4 and port address 0x3f8. I am not sure. uart none is what I did to be able to load a kernel module which also directly accessed that port. (atarisio) So I would think it would be sufficient to not get in the way of dosemu. Perhaps not though. --=20 Ryan Underwood, --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAMchBIonHnh+67jkRAlWbAJwJGaQ4fy/WAbXw4t1HHqDiJwsGzgCff1p1 OKlmD5XY8mAfRnhc248cmAw= =3Br1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR--