From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Fischer Subject: are there any limitations to use drive c on nfs volumes? Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:57:21 +0200 Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <200409241157.21654.Christian.Fischer@fischundfischer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1139593.XggNH0Exh6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Id: To: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org --nextPart1139593.XggNH0Exh6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi there. I've moved my local homes to server based homes mounted via autofs. I'm running an foxpro application. This application starts but it hangs on= =20 touching the database. Strace told me that the ressource is temporary=20 unavailiable and at statup of strace it tolds me "SHAREing doesn't work on drive C: (probably NFS volume?)" I'm running dosemu 1.2.0.0 on Linux version 2.6.7-gentoo-r11. Please don't ask me why my dos app isn't on my local file system. Well, I=20 confirm that the local file system is the better place for apps than an nfs= =20 volume. This was the first test and i had planned to do the the move to the= =20 local filesystem for later. Regards Christian=20 =2D-=20 --nextPart1139593.XggNH0Exh6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBU++BszmQKstIgt4RAr5TAJ4zldux15JKSljue+jWMRcO0Bjn3QCgp9IS P/QLxgSOVyhaM4HVK1VXC0k= =OYq9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1139593.XggNH0Exh6--