From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christian Fischer <Christian.Fischer@fischundfischer.com>
Subject: Re: are there any limitations to use drive c on nfs volumes?
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:20:21 +0200
Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <200409241320.22144.Christian.Fischer@fischundfischer.com>
References: <200409241157.21654.Christian.Fischer@fischundfischer.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart21494504.CsDCkT1uer";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <200409241157.21654.Christian.Fischer@fischundfischer.com>
List-Id: <linux-msdos.vger.kernel.org>
To: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org

--nextPart21494504.CsDCkT1uer
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday 24 September 2004 11:57, Christian Fischer wrote:

> Please don't ask me why my dos app isn't on my local file system. Well, I
> confirm that the local file system is the better place for apps than an n=
fs
> volume. This was the first test and i had planned to do the the move to t=
he
> local filesystem for later.

Sorry, sometimes english language isn't so easy. I wanted to say
"Well, I agree with you .."

I've moved the drives to the local filesystem, everything works fine.
If dosemu can't use nfs volumes why my app thinks that the database is in=20
place? Normally the app tells me if no database is present.

Christian
=2D-=20

--nextPart21494504.CsDCkT1uer
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.9.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBVAL2szmQKstIgt4RAs+aAKCvJT1mIqzmldjVI3gqBydfX7rWggCcDWgD
94Z8oFDcZDmBbrkd+AxYyH0=
=UEKG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart21494504.CsDCkT1uer--