From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?q?Rafa=C5=82_Cygnarowski?= Subject: Re: Dosemu Slower than CMD Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 08:23:02 +0100 Message-ID: <200803160823.08902.rafilists@gmail.com> References: <34cfb2e90803150947l4bf52c93g73289365331ebec1@mail.gmail.com> <47DC2964.6060308@frey.de> <34cfb2e90803151922h689bbe90p3c6108f2538b2cf3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart133964957.Ecol2RoOBs"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <34cfb2e90803151922h689bbe90p3c6108f2538b2cf3@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org --nextPart133964957.Ecol2RoOBs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Dnia niedziela, 16 marca 2008, Eddy Setyawan napisa=C5=82: > I found information about samba mounting in dosemu is this can > increase disk access performance? It depends on what you are using now for file sharing. If you use e.g.=20 mars_nwe or netware, then yes it can. Remember that "samba for dosemu" wasn= 't=20 tested on 64bit distributions yet. I successfully run it on 32 bit=20 distribution with hogthreshold =3D 1. Of course if your application needs m= ore=20 cpu power eg. for counting sth, hogthreshold =3D 1 could be not enough. Anyway... you should consider switching to 32 bit distribution if you are=20 aware of emulation accuracy and speed. Regards, =2D-=20 Rafa=C5=82 Cygnarowski rafilists [at] gmail [dot] com --nextPart133964957.Ecol2RoOBs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkfcytwACgkQiTbqoF5x7W7T2wCcDNNYgtzwJbFDcnm0U95cA/79 RW4An0FITlOQhCgEGUIYDJUUqpOAPFMX =XJ8y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart133964957.Ecol2RoOBs--