From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott <drmemory@3rivers.net>
Subject: Re: Symlinked drive
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:28:51 -0700
Message-ID: <20110310212851.GD1454@drmemory.local>
References: <20110310182739.GA1454@drmemory.local> <20110310130243.9e2db3ea.theatre@sasktel.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110310130243.9e2db3ea.theatre@sasktel.net>
Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-msdos.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Frank Cox <theatre@sasktel.net>
Cc: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:02:43PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:27:40 -0700
> Scott wrote:
> 
> > How to proceed?
> 
> How about creating the symlink on dosemu's C: drive, then using the subst
> command to map it to drive E:?

Oh yeah! Been a *long* time since I've worked with dos other than to
use old apps I developed back then. Forgot all about subst!

BUT: it now gives me a "File allocation table bad" error! The symlink
still looks fine, just the subst'ed drive e: doesn't work. Strange.

Thanks for the help!

Scott Swanson