public inbox for linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Liang Z Li <liang.z.li@intel.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>,
	Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kern
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/17] x86/mpx: Do not use R/EBP as base in the SIB byte with Mod = 0
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 22:36:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170223063706.71554-3-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170223063706.71554-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>

Section 2.2.1.2 of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
Developer's Manual volume 2A states that when a SIB byte is used and the
base of the SIB byte points to R/EBP (i.e., base = 5) and the mod part
of the ModRM byte is zero, the value of such register will not be used
as part of the address computation. To signal this, a -EDOM error is
returned to indicate callers that they should ignore the value.

Also, for this particular case, a displacement of 32-bits should follow
the SIB byte if the mod part of ModRM is equal to zero. The instruction
decoder ensures that this is the case.

Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>
Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/mpx.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
index 6a034bc..f660ddf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
@@ -121,6 +121,17 @@ static int get_reg_offset(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs,
 
 	case REG_TYPE_BASE:
 		regno = X86_SIB_BASE(insn->sib.value);
+		/*
+		 * If mod is 0 and register R/EBP (regno=5) is indicated in the
+		 * base part of the SIB byte, the value of such register should
+		 * not be used in the address computation. Also, a 32-bit
+		 * displacement is expected in this case; the instruction
+		 * decoder takes care of it. This is true for both R13 and
+		 * R/EBP as REX.B will not be decoded.
+		 */
+		if (regno == 5 && X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) == 0)
+			return -EDOM;
+
 		if (X86_REX_B(insn->rex_prefix.value))
 			regno += 8;
 		break;
@@ -160,16 +171,22 @@ static void __user *mpx_get_addr_ref(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs)
 		addr = regs_get_register(regs, addr_offset);
 	} else {
 		if (insn->sib.nbytes) {
+			/*
+			 * Negative values in the base and index offset means
+			 * an error when decoding the SIB byte. Except -EDOM,
+			 * which means that the registers should not be used
+			 * in the address computation.
+			 */
 			base_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_BASE);
 			if (base_offset < 0)
-				goto out_err;
+				if (base_offset == -EDOM)
+					base = 0;
+				else
+					goto out_err;
+			else
+				base = regs_get_register(regs, base_offset);
 
 			indx_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_INDEX);
-			/*
-			 * A negative offset generally means a error, except
-			 * -EDOM, which means that the contents of the register
-			 * should not be used as index.
-			 */
 			if (indx_offset < 0)
 				if (indx_offset == -EDOM)
 					indx = 0;
@@ -178,7 +195,6 @@ static void __user *mpx_get_addr_ref(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs)
 			else
 				indx = regs_get_register(regs, indx_offset);
 
-			base = regs_get_register(regs, base_offset);
 			addr = base + indx * (1 << X86_SIB_SCALE(sib));
 		} else {
 			addr_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM);
-- 
2.9.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-23  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-23  6:36 [PATCH v4 00/17] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-02-23  6:36 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB index if index points to R/ESP Ricardo Neri
2017-02-23  7:24   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-23  9:50     ` Paul Crawford
2017-02-23 12:47       ` Coding style vs legibility [was Re: [PATCH v4 01/17] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB index if index points to R/ESP] Mouse
2017-02-23 22:17     ` [PATCH v4 01/17] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB index if index points to R/ESP Ricardo Neri
2017-02-24  2:33       ` Joe Perches
2017-02-24  2:41         ` Ricardo Neri
2017-02-24 14:47         ` Nathan Howard
2017-02-24 19:07           ` Ricardo Neri
2017-02-24 15:00         ` Adan Hawthorn
2017-02-23  6:36 ` Ricardo Neri [this message]
2017-02-23  6:36 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] x86/mpx, x86/insn: Relocate insn util functions to a new insn-kernel Ricardo Neri
2017-02-23 10:54   ` kbuild test robot
2017-02-23 22:18     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-02-23  6:36 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get register offsets Ricardo Neri
2017-02-23  6:36 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to get segment selector Ricardo Neri
2017-02-23  6:36 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to get segment descriptor Ricardo Neri
2017-02-23  6:36 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to get segment descriptor base address Ricardo Neri
2017-02-23  6:36 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] x86/insn-eval: Add functions to get default operand and address sizes Ricardo Neri
2017-02-23  6:36 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] x86/insn-eval: Do not use R/EBP as base if mod in ModRM is zero Ricardo Neri
2017-02-23  6:36 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] insn/eval: Incorporate segment base in address computation Ricardo Neri
2017-02-23  6:37 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] x86/insn-eval: Add support to resolve 16-bit addressing encodings Ricardo Neri
2017-02-23  6:37 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] x86/cpufeature: Add User-Mode Instruction Prevention definitions Ricardo Neri
2017-02-23  6:37 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] x86: Add emulation code for UMIP instructions Ricardo Neri
2017-02-23  6:37 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] x86/umip: Force a page fault when unable to copy emulated result to user Ricardo Neri
2017-02-23  6:37 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] x86/traps: Fixup general protection faults caused by UMIP Ricardo Neri
2017-02-23  9:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-23 22:15     ` Ricardo Neri
2017-02-24 19:11       ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-02-24 19:36         ` Ricardo Neri
2017-02-24 19:45           ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-02-23  6:37 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention Ricardo Neri
2017-02-23  6:37 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] selftests/x86: Add tests for " Ricardo Neri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170223063706.71554-3-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@mellanox.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=julliard@winehq.org \
    --cc=liang.z.li@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kern \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=slaoub@gmail.com \
    --cc=stsp@list.ru \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox