From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stas Sergeev Subject: Re: 113: plugin/keyboard vs. plugin/kbd_unicode ? Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:21:00 +0400 Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <3D45A3AC.4030009@yahoo.com> Reply-To: stas.orel@mailcity.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org Hello. Per Jessen wrote: > In plugin/kbd_unicode, "no keyboard" is explicitly recognised, > but doesn't seem to default to reading stdin ? Looking in keyb_none.c it seems that "no keyboard" does absolutely nothing - just a dummy client. Raw keyboard client seems to be using stdin (see raw_keyboard_init() ). > Which part of the keyboard code is actually being used for 113 ? non-unicode one. > Eric Biedermans kbd_unicode looks somewhat cleaner, but it is > not the default that is "shipped"? It is default since 1.1.3.2 so upgrade if you are going to do some hacking. As of your other message: lredir still works OK for me (1.1.3.2)