From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stas Sergeev <stssppnn@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: IPX networking
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 19:16:50 +0300
Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <3DBD62F2.5060109@yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="------------030108060601060607040802"
Return-path: <linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: <linux-msdos.vger.kernel.org>
To: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030108060601060607040802
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello.

Sergey Suleymanov wrote:
>         When I run dosemu without root privs, it says: (here 333 is
>         internal net of the native NetWare server) 
> ERROR: IPX: Failure adding route <00000333 through 
> 00000111:000000000001>
> Is this ok?
Doesn't look healthy to me.
Does this patch help?
Patch is completely untested, but it compiles:)

--------------030108060601060607040802
Content-Type: text/plain;
 name="ipx_route.diff"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="ipx_route.diff"

--- src/dosext/net/net/ipxglt.c	Sun Oct 27 17:35:39 2002
+++ src/dosext/net/net/ipxglt.c	Mon Oct 28 19:03:27 2002
@@ -109,8 +109,20 @@
 	sscanf(proc_str, "%s %s", proc_net, proc_node);
 	close_proc_scan();
 
-	if (strcmp(buf_net, proc_net) || strcmp(buf_node, proc_node))
-		return 0;
+	if (strcmp(buf_net, proc_net) || strcmp(buf_node, proc_node)) {
+		open_proc_scan("/proc/net/ipx_interface");
+		proc_str = get_proc_string_by_key(buf_net);
+		if (!proc_str) {
+			close_proc_scan();
+			return 0;
+		}
+		if (!strstr(proc_str, "Internal")) {
+			close_proc_scan();
+			return 0;
+		}
+		close_proc_scan();
+		/* fall through */
+	}
 
 	return 1;
 }

--------------030108060601060607040802--