Hello.

Sergey Suleymanov wrote:
> Stas> dosemu required at all, just "upgrade your glibc" message.  
> Wow! :) That's sort of using a steam-hammer to crack nuts.
Yes:)

> Stas> I can't beleive it can be simply missing, after reading "man
> Stas> inet".
> I read it too. And saw just unsigned long int :) System is
That makes sense.
OK, as the in_addr_t is not really used
(only once for sizeof), then there should
be no problems at all avoiding it entirely.
The attached trivial patch should do the trick.