public inbox for linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Foxpro in RH9
@ 2003-05-25 17:12 Marek Kriz
  2003-05-25 21:22 ` Grigory Batalov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marek Kriz @ 2003-05-25 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-msdos

Hi!

In RH9 with Dosemu 1.1.4.15 when starting Foxpro 2.6a (under DRDOS 7.03)
I am getting SIGSEGV. In previous RH8 wasn't such problem. XMS is OFF,
EMS is OFF, DPMI is 8192, DOSMEM is 640. How can I determine where is
the problem?

Bye, M
-- 
Marek Kriz <marek.kriz@tco.cz>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Foxpro in RH9
  2003-05-25 17:12 Marek Kriz
@ 2003-05-25 21:22 ` Grigory Batalov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Grigory Batalov @ 2003-05-25 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-msdos

On 25 May 2003 19:12:37 +0200
Marek Kriz <marek.kriz@tco.cz> wrote:

> In RH9 with Dosemu 1.1.4.15 when starting Foxpro 2.6a (under DRDOS 7.03)
> I am getting SIGSEGV. In previous RH8 wasn't such problem. XMS is OFF,
> EMS is OFF, DPMI is 8192, DOSMEM is 640. How can I determine where is
> the problem?

  Try DOSMEM=ON in config.fp (FoxPro config).

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Foxpro in RH9
@ 2003-05-28 13:00 Marek Kriz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marek Kriz @ 2003-05-28 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-msdos

Hi!

>In RH9 with Dosemu 1.1.4.15 when starting Foxpro 2.6a (under DRDOS 7.03)
>> I am getting SIGSEGV. In previous RH8 wasn't such problem. XMS is OFF,
>> EMS is OFF, DPMI is 8192, DOSMEM is 640. How can I determine where is
>> the problem?
>  
>
>
>  Try DOSMEM=ON in config.fp (FoxPro config).
>
Same result as before. SIGSEGV. Can I help with some -DEBUG output? And 
what?

Thanks, bye, M




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Foxpro in RH9
@ 2003-05-30 18:39 Stas Sergeev
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stas Sergeev @ 2003-05-30 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-msdos

Hello.

Marek Kriz wrote:
>>> I am getting SIGSEGV. In previous RH8 wasn't such
>>> problem. XMS is OFF,
>>> EMS is OFF, DPMI is 8192,
Why are you disabling EMS and XMS and
setting the DPMI so low?

>>  Try DOSMEM=ON in config.fp (FoxPro config).
> Same result as before. SIGSEGV. Can I help with some -DEBUG output?
Hmm, because you've explicitly stated
that the problem didn't happen in RH8,
I would think configuring the dos soft
just as well as the dosemu itself may
be futile.
I've heard about some problems with nptl.
Even though this is a wild guess, try
this:
export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5
It helps wine under RH9, so maybe it can
help also dosemu?
However, does any other DPMI program
work? Can you just run dos4gw? Or is the
DPMI subsystem is completely non-functional
under RH9?
What kernel is there? Can you try the
fresh 2.4.20 and see if it helps?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Foxpro in RH9
@ 2003-06-15  6:57 Marek Kriz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marek Kriz @ 2003-06-15  6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-msdos

Hi!

Why are you disabling EMS and XMS and
> setting the DPMI so low (8192)?
> 

Because for DOS FoxPro is it enough.


> I've heard about some problems with nptl.
> Even though this is a wild guess, try
> this:
> export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5

Yes, it helps! DPMI is back. 
Tested also with new 1.1.5.0 (and 1.1.4.15).


> What kernel is there? Can you try the
> fresh 2.4.20 and see if it helps?

2.4.20-18.9 = last from RedHat updates.

Any more tests are needed?


Thanks, bye, M

-- 
Marek Kriz <mcross@email.cz>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Foxpro in RH9
@ 2003-06-15 12:53 Stas Sergeev
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stas Sergeev @ 2003-06-15 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-msdos

Hello.

Marek Kriz wrote:
>> export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5
> Yes, it helps! DPMI is back.
Very bad... That means we are NPTL-incompatible
for some reasons.

>> fresh 2.4.20 and see if it helps?
> 2.4.20-18.9 = last from RedHat updates.
> Any more tests are needed?
Yes, *fresh* 2.4.21 would be a good test-case
if compilling the kernel doesn't hurt you too
much.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Foxpro in RH9
@ 2003-06-15 13:33 Stas Sergeev
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stas Sergeev @ 2003-06-15 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-msdos

Hello.

Marek Kriz wrote:
> Any more tests are needed?
Another interesting test would be to change
#ifdef __linux__
to
#if 0
in dpmi.c, line 24
recompile and see if probably this also fixes
the problem.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-06-15 13:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-06-15 12:53 Foxpro in RH9 Stas Sergeev
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-15 13:33 Stas Sergeev
2003-06-15  6:57 Marek Kriz
2003-05-30 18:39 Stas Sergeev
2003-05-28 13:00 Marek Kriz
2003-05-25 17:12 Marek Kriz
2003-05-25 21:22 ` Grigory Batalov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox