From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stas Sergeev Subject: Re: win3.1 attempts :) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:06:51 +0400 Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <3F6D783B.50806@aknet.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org Hello. Ryan Underwood wrote: >> problem is that it (most likely) simply runs win.com, which is >> trying dosx.exe or win386.exe - both without any success. > But at this point, no win.com exists. Should it? No idea, but if not, then it starts dosx.exe directly, which is very likely. The work-around might be to replace both dosx.exe and win386.exe with os2k386.exe (also in their .ex_ form). I just tried that and was able to use win.com to run windows. I think this should be an official way, instead of winemu.bat. Replacing krnl386.exe is not needed (and never was I think).