* Two cents worth of IPX/SPX
@ 2003-12-26 9:34 norseman
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: norseman @ 2003-12-26 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org
I've been reading the IPX/SPX incoming "conversations".
Something to keep as a background thought:
I've been running packet passing in "real" MSDOS for over
a decade with virtually no problems. Any that do occur have been
tracked to other end - so far.
Also - all attempts to run non-packet passing interfaces
in "real" MSDOS have lead to numerous and continuous problems.
MSDOS is interrupt driven. Thus - less interrupts in the
chain the less chance MSDOS has to trip over itself.
I know this does not help directly in solving anything but it does
lend support to why Stas Sergeev makes the comment:
.
.
... (using IPX via the packet driver is
now faster than via native IPX support), ...
.
.
to Reinhard Karcher.
Kind-of a case where Linux and MSDOS prefer packet passing, and
working with, rather than against, gets better results.
So much for my 2 cents worth.
Steve Turner
norseman@firstlight.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-12-26 9:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-26 9:34 Two cents worth of IPX/SPX norseman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox