From: Dave Phillips <dlphilp@bright.net>
To: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: no MIDI input with dosemu ?
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:16:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <400D3856.5020803@bright.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401161545240.1237@robpc2.home.org>
Greetings:
The short story so far is that Stas Sergeev has posted a patch that
gives MIDI input to CVS dosemu. I don't know whether Stas's patch is
included with the new 1.2.0 dosemu, but I imagine it can be compiled
against it anyway (Stas, any additional instructions for your patch +
1.2.0 ?). This patch effectively gives full-strength to DOS MIDI
sequencers such as Sequencer Plus and Cakewalk. Also, the current dosemu
no longer requires explicit IRQ selection for Voyetra's vapimpu.com MIDI
interface driver; furthermore, it now accepts the last version of that
driver (1.51) which is now freely available from Voyetra's site. I'd
love to see if it could support the vapimqx.com driver for my Music
Quest MQX32M, but my machine has no ISA slot for the card.
I'll be writing a summary HOWTO in the nest week or so and will notify
this list when it's completed.
Vast thanks to Stas, Bart, and all the dosemu developers for the
amazing software they've created.
WRT timing better than the host: I'm afraid I've mis-spoke myself. Of
course the emulator cannot provide better system timing, but the
application's coding can certainly be better. In the case of Seq+ I've
played MIDI files without error that will not play correctly via MusE or
Rosegarden. I believe Seq+ may have better timing resolution, and I know
that it was a heavily optimized program for its day. I've sent the
offending files to the ALSA and MusE developers, but the fact remains
that I still get better performance out of Seq+. I apologize for the
confusion regarding my statements.
Best regards,
Dave Phillips
Robert Komar wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Ged Haywood wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I don't know why the *recording* of a midi file can be better under
>>>dosemu that under linux. Even the midid, the helper program that
>>>comes with dosemu, can record the midi files very well. From that
>>>point of view I don't see the value of implementing the midi
>>>recording under dosemu - you should be able to use dos-based progs
>>>even if you recorded the song under linux. Feel free to explain
>>>[snip]
>>>(better not CCing to linux-msdos since it would be an off-topic here)
>>> if you would like.
>>>
>>>
>>Please, if you don't continue the thread on the List, CC me too.
>>I have a friend who is very interested. He plays a "SynthAxe"
>>(and it's astounding:).
>>
>>73,
>>Ged.
>>
>>
>
>Hi,
>I'm also curious about how a user application like dosemu can provide
>better timing than the operating system. Please continue this thread
>publicly!
>
>Cheers,
>Rob Komar
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-msdos" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-20 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-16 6:21 Re: no MIDI input with dosemu ? steve.home
2004-01-16 13:27 ` Dave Phillips
2004-01-16 17:32 ` Stas Sergeev
2004-01-16 22:25 ` Ged Haywood
2004-01-16 23:47 ` Robert Komar
2004-01-20 14:16 ` Dave Phillips [this message]
2004-01-20 15:50 ` Bart Oldeman
2004-01-20 20:45 ` Dave Phillips
2004-01-21 4:42 ` Justin Zygmont
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-16 17:18 Stas Sergeev
2004-01-08 13:53 Stas Sergeev
2004-01-08 15:16 ` Dave Phillips
[not found] ` <3FFD9C0D.90804@aknet.ru>
[not found] ` <3FFDA3E1.5070508@bright.net>
2004-01-09 1:18 ` Stas Sergeev
2004-01-09 8:31 ` Ryan Underwood
2003-12-26 20:17 Is sound in dosemu a myth? JLB
2004-01-08 13:22 ` no MIDI input with dosemu ? Dave Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=400D3856.5020803@bright.net \
--to=dlphilp@bright.net \
--cc=linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox