From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Agus Budy Wuysang <fswmis@fasw.co.id>
Subject: Re: telix
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 19:31:10 +0700
Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <40335B0E.3000907@fasw.co.id>
References: <1100547.1076683894447.SLOX.WebMail.wwwrun@linux.hubrich.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1100547.1076683894447.SLOX.WebMail.wwwrun@linux.hubrich.org>
List-Id: <linux-msdos.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nicolai Kuntze <nicolai@hubrich.org>

Nicolai Kuntze wrote:
 > Hi,
 >
 > does anyone uses telix? Is there a known problem?
 >
 > Greetings
 >
 > Nicolai

If you were talking about the ancient telix terminal
program (procomm clone), then no.

You may need the old Fossil (BBS kinda COMport TSR driver
to take advantage of the 16550A UART). CMIIW.

http://www.juge.com/bbs/Dos.Html

-- 
+-R-| Mozilla 1.6 Gecko20040116 |-H-| Powered by Linux 2.4.x |-9-+
|/v\ Agus Budy Wuysang                   MIS Department          |
| |  Phone:  +62-21-344-1316 ext 317     GSM: +62-816-1972-051   |
+------------| http://www.fasw.co.id/person/supes/ |-------------+