public inbox for linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maurilio Longo <maurilio.longo@libero.it>
To: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Dosemu and clipper applications eating all CPU
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:55:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <404F9CEF.9030300@libero.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <404F6E4F.6060207@aknet.ru>

Stas,

clipper calls time-of-day interrupt when idle, don't have right number 
of interrupt call here at home, but I did write some years ago a little 
TSR to release cpu under OS/2 and I'm using a home-made dosemu 1.0.x at 
work with a changed handling of this interrupt call inside dosemu code, 
tomorrow I'll tell you the right call.

regards.



Stas Sergeev wrote:

>
> Hello.
>
> Maximiliano Curia wrote:
>
>>> Problem of clipper I presume? If it
>>> just runs in a busy loop while idle,
>>> dosemu can't really help.
>>
>>  Yes, that dosemu doesn't detect the clipper idle calls.
>
> But *what kind* of idle calls?
> This is the vital info. If you
> can't find the answer, then the
> problem can't be fixed:)
> int 0x28 is the real idle call,
> but since dosemu catches that,
> I suspect clipper does something
> else.
>
>> It still eats the cpu, with nice -n 19, but now the 60% is marked as
>> nice.
>
> Yes, and the system must not be
> crawled now at least. At least in
> a theory:)
>
>> I'm trying to understand the freedos idle.
>
> That might be not the case either.
> FreeDOS can just call int16 to do
> a blocking wait for a keypress, and
> that will do the trick.
> You have to find out what exactly
> the clipper does however.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-msdos" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

-- 
 __________
|  |  | |__|  Maurilio Longo
|_|_|_|____| 



  reply	other threads:[~2004-03-10 22:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-10 19:36 Dosemu and clipper applications eating all CPU Stas Sergeev
2004-03-10 22:55 ` Maurilio Longo [this message]
2004-03-11  8:29   ` Maurilio Longo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-28 17:32 Stas Sergeev
2004-04-28  5:55 Mgr. Peter Tuharsky
2004-04-28 19:52 ` Maximiliano Curia
2004-03-15 19:17 Stas Sergeev
2004-03-15 17:50 Stas Sergeev
2004-03-15 18:07 ` Maurilio Longo
2004-03-12 22:33 Stas Sergeev
2004-03-15 11:53 ` Maurilio Longo
2004-03-11 18:44 Stas Sergeev
2004-03-10 18:36 Stas Sergeev
2004-03-09 20:16 Stas Sergeev
2004-03-10 15:29 ` Peter B. Steiger
2004-03-10 19:11 ` Maximiliano Curia
2004-03-08 16:11 Maximiliano Curia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=404F9CEF.9030300@libero.it \
    --to=maurilio.longo@libero.it \
    --cc=linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox