* More than 3 LPTs?
@ 2004-03-29 14:11 Michael Hipp
2004-03-29 15:04 ` Bart Oldeman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Hipp @ 2004-03-29 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-msdos
Hello, I'm new to DOSEMU, question ...
Is there any way to use more than 3 LPTx ports?
I have a DOS application that needs lots of printers. This worked back
when we actually run it under DOS and it works under Win98 now. (Tho I
realize having that many printer ports is not really a common thing.)
I'm trying to get this client upgraded to Linux.
Any help appreciated,
Michael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: More than 3 LPTs?
2004-03-29 14:11 More than 3 LPTs? Michael Hipp
@ 2004-03-29 15:04 ` Bart Oldeman
2004-03-29 22:03 ` Michael Hipp
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bart Oldeman @ 2004-03-29 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Hipp; +Cc: linux-msdos
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Michael Hipp wrote:
> Is there any way to use more than 3 LPTx ports?
No. The BIOS (any BIOS, except the 8088 which has 4) doesn't support more
than 3.
> I have a DOS application that needs lots of printers. This worked back
> when we actually run it under DOS and it works under Win98 now. (Tho I
> realize having that many printer ports is not really a common thing.)
I'm not sure what LPTx you're talking about here. Isn't it a network
printer? LPT5 does simply not exist -- and I wouldn't know which parallel
port it would use from DOS' point of view...
If the printer works like a file then you could just try to link to it on
an lredir'ed drive in Linux (printer would be d:\printer.foo or something
like that).
Bart
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: More than 3 LPTs?
2004-03-29 15:04 ` Bart Oldeman
@ 2004-03-29 22:03 ` Michael Hipp
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Hipp @ 2004-03-29 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-msdos
Bart Oldeman wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Michael Hipp wrote:
>
>
>>Is there any way to use more than 3 LPTx ports?
>
>
> No. The BIOS (any BIOS, except the 8088 which has 4) doesn't support more
> than 3.
>
>
>>I have a DOS application that needs lots of printers. This worked back
>>when we actually run it under DOS and it works under Win98 now. (Tho I
>>realize having that many printer ports is not really a common thing.)
>
>
> I'm not sure what LPTx you're talking about here. Isn't it a network
> printer? LPT5 does simply not exist -- and I wouldn't know which parallel
> port it would use from DOS' point of view...
I probably asked my question poorly. I don't really want more "ports"
(as in hardware ports), what I need are more printers (but DOS only
knows about them as LPTx). And most of them would be network printers.
So I guess what I'm looking for is a way to have the DOS app see more
LPT ports and have them redirected to a real printer on a server somewhere.
> If the printer works like a file then you could just try to link to it on
> an lredir'ed drive in Linux (printer would be d:\printer.foo or something
> like that).
I didn't understand this part, could you elaborate a bit.
Thanks,
Michael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-29 22:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-29 14:11 More than 3 LPTs? Michael Hipp
2004-03-29 15:04 ` Bart Oldeman
2004-03-29 22:03 ` Michael Hipp
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox