From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Reinhard Karcher <rkarcher@frey.de>
Subject: Re: dosemu in Debian GNU/Linux call for help (Re: Bug#352100: [Fwd:
 Bug#352100: dosemu: package 1.3.2 or higher for fixes/features])
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:18:19 +0100
Message-ID: <455443DB.7010907@frey.de>
References: <45543293.20005@modsoftsys.com> <1163149418.4000.53.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1163149418.4000.53.camel@localhost>
Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-msdos.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: 
Cc: 352100-quiet@bugs.debian.org, linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org

Bart Martens schrieb:
> But, maybe it is better to forget 1.3.3 and focus on 1.4.x.  Everyone is
> most welcome to help the upstream dosemu development team [1] with
> getting 1.4.x ready for a stable upstream release [2].  Please help with
> solving the upstream bugs [3].
> 
> [1]: http://www.dosemu.org/
> [2]: http://dosemu.sourceforge.net/stable/
> [3]: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=457447&group_id=49784&func=browse
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart Martens
> 

I don't know when 1.4 will be out, but the code in the subversion
repository is much better the 1.2.2 and the code in experimantal.

If 1.4 is not ready for etch, I vote for the code in the subversion
repository, but that decision is left to Bart Oldeman, as he is
responsible for the code.

Some of the above mentioned bugs are gone, but there no notice, that
they are resolved.


Reinhard