From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike McCarty Subject: Re: loadhi in dosemu-1.4.0-1.i386.rpm Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:11:42 -0500 Message-ID: <465DBE5E.5020705@sbcglobal.net> References: <20070530005956.6dcdcaf0.theatre@melvilletheatre.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org Bart Oldeman wrote: > On 5/30/07, Frank Cox wrote: > >> Has loadhi disappeared by accident or design in the latest dosemu rpm? >> >> I can find it in dosemu-1.2.2-1.i386.rpm, but it's missing in >> 1.4.0-1.i386.rpm. >> >> And if it's by design, is there a list of other dos commands that have >> been >> removed or replaced for whatever reason? > > > loadhi isn't necessary anymore because the same functionality is > provided by command.com's internal lh (or loadhigh) command. > > shsucdx is also gone (replaced by the "c" option of lredir). I thought the idea behind DOSEMU and FREEDOS was to provide an open source and free environment which faithfully emulated the MSDOS environment. Removing commands because they are redundant will break existing systems, causing them to fail. In this particular case, it is difficult to think of a case where that would happen, since a batch file could most likely be edited, and I don't know why a program would use LOADHI, but it still seems to me to be a departure from the original goal. Mike -- p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN. This message made from 100% recycled bits. You have found the bank of Larn. I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you. I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!