From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alain M." Subject: Re: cifs 1.50 and dosemu 1.4 great combination Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 02:31:23 -0300 Message-ID: <470F06AB.2000200@pobox.com> References: <1192113011.28214.21.camel@localhost> <470E52D1.5040406@pobox.com> <1192159242.2490.10.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1192159242.2490.10.camel@localhost> Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: dosEmu-list kemas escreveu: > >> A clipper program runs on dosemu (I supose withe FreeDOS), dosemu runs >> on centos. But dosemu uses either an image (where lock work) or the >> linux fle system, I supose then that cifs is replacing samba and that >> lock work between doemu and cifs... >> > cifs does not replace samba, samba still the file server. > > cifs is use as the filesystem to mount samba share, then dosemu would run our program on > lredired drive. > the lock here means file locking between multiuser apps that use the same file. Could you give setup commands? This may interest more people, so I am bringing it back to the list... I am not sure that I understand: You have a samba server, maybe even on the same machine; cifs then replaces samba-client, on every machine; then dosemu relays the file-locks correctly. Are you using freeDOS? Sorry if I may seam a little dumb, but some time ago Bart said that lock did NOT work... and I googled about cifs and could not really understand the details. Thanks, Alain