From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike McCarty Subject: Re: Cobol app takes 100% CPU Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:53:10 -0600 Message-ID: <47EBDF06.9040503@sbcglobal.net> References: <87bq51lk5j.fsf@pequena.ucpel.tche.br> <20080326092813.df658a5e.theatre@sasktel.net> <87ej9wpdsa.fsf@pequena.ucpel.tche.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87ej9wpdsa.fsf@pequena.ucpel.tche.br> Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Rodrigo Real Cc: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org Rodrigo Real wrote: > I once took a look at Tame, but didn't tried it, since it was a paid > software and I didn't know anything about it, I just didn't pay > attention. But it is good to know that it works. I didn't reply, because I wasn't sure I understood your issue. Have you tried simply running dosemu with nice? I wouldn't care if dosemu ate all the CPU, so long as other processes weren't slowed down when they wanted to run. For example, I run the GIMPS on my machine. It's always 100% CPU utilization as a consequence. But if the response is slow, it's not because of GIMPS. Mike -- p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN. This message made from 100% recycled bits. You have found the bank of Larn. I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you. I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!