public inbox for linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frantisek Hanzlik <franta@hanzlici.cz>
To: Eddy Setyawan <eddymilis@teguhabadi.com>
Cc: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Dosemu Slower than CMD
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 10:15:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48410933.4020101@hanzlici.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <34cfb2e90805300203t1f904938q60405bbbe3e035a2@mail.gmail.com>

I just haven't no win machine, then I can't compare program response under
them.
However You can compile dosemu with log timestamping (see conditional
compilation  and SHOW_TIME and DBG_TIME identifiers in module
"src/base/misc/utilities.c") and try find Your application/dosemu code
bottleneck.

IMHO when Your app do any sort of intensive DOS/BIOS calls, then differences
between DOS/win and dosemu speed may be noticeable and scale 1:3 - 1:5
may be "normal", as their appropriate environments are different.

You may also tried Your app under clear FreeDOS or other DOS environment.

Franta Hanzlik

Eddy Setyawan wrote:
> Times for load this section is more faster when i run it on windows using CMD
> any idea to tweak dosemu to make this section faster like CMD does
> 
> quote "Note I must set DOS date to March 2008."
>   i think so because this app have closing month mechanism
> 
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik<franta@hanzlici.cz>  wrote:
>> Yes, I tried this section. Times are from pres Enter key at
>> "Ubah Harga Jual" to obtain some data - these appear as:
>>
>>   Browse  Search  Edit  Add  Del  Print  Restrukturisasi
>>   Melihat data-data dalam bentuk daftar
>> ¨UA                             CV. MITRA BANGUNAN
>>   20/03/2008¨U
>> ©°©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤ GROUP/ SUB GROUP
>> ©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©´
>> ©¦      Kode Group : 00001
>>     ©¦
>> ©¦            Nama : PT NIPSEA PAINT
>>     ©¦
>> ©¦ Kd. Group Induk :           (                                     )
>>     ©¦
>> ©¦     Jenis Group : F ( Induk )            Level :  1
>>     ©¦
>> ©¦     Harga Sales :          0        Ubah Harga : 2 Tidak
>>    ©¦
>> ©¦      Harga Toko :          0
>>    ©¦
>> ©¦  Terakhir Ganti :                         Oleh :
>>    ©¦
>> ©¦©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©Ð©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©Ð©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©Ð©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¦
>> ©¦Kode Barang    ©¦ Nama Barang                            ©¦ H. Sales ©¦ H.
>> Toko  ©¦
>> ©¦1000001        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG BS9102SS WHITE     ©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¦1000002        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG 680 COTTON WHITE   ©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¦1000003        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG BS9102 WHITE       ©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¦1000004        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG 900 EXTRA WHITE    ©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¦1000005        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG 660SB BRILLIANT WHI©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¦1000006        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG 600 DIVINITY       ©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¦1000007        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG 604 SPANISH WHITE  ©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¦1000008        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG 603 SUSU           ©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¦1000009        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG 607 BROKEN WHITE   ©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¦1000010        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG 616 CREAM          ©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¸©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¼
>>   Esc¨BQuit  ¡û¡ú,Enter¨BMenu  Home¨BFirst  PgUp¨BPrev  PgDn¨BNext  End¨BLast
>>
>> CPU load I not measure, but as I said, 100% load may be OK.
>>
>> Note I must set DOS date to March 2008.
>>
>> Franta
>>
>> Eddy Setyawan wrote:
>>> hello Frantistek,
>>> Which segment you try ? I mean slow is at menu Master ->   Persediaan ->
>>> Ubah Harga Jual, while entering this section application cpu usage
>>> jump to 100% and waiting to load all data is takes time than CMD
>>> does... even at windows i try it with shared drive
>>>
>>> some alert dialog also eat CPU but after search around i found that
>>> clipper function for alert dialog has some bug
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik<franta@hanzlici.cz>
>>>   wrote:
>>>> As I wrote in my previous mail, in tested program segment is about
>>>> 200000 times called INT0x16 Fn 0x11 : Check_Enhanced_Keystroke.
>>>> In corresponding dosemu routines in "base/bios/int16.c" are called
>>>> some delay functions - maybe these may add some delay to program
>>>> execution.
>>>> On my system CLK_TCK=100 (ticks/sec), thus JIFFIE_TIME=10000 and
>>>> INT2F_IDLE_USECS=80000 (=>   80msec delay).
>>>> But as I wrote, on my faster PC exec time was 3 sec, thus delay
>>>> added in INT16 can't be longer.
>>>>
>>>> Bart Oldeman probably can say more about this.
>>>>



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-msdos" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-05-31  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-15 16:47 Dosemu Slower than CMD Eddy Setyawan
2008-03-15 19:54 ` Reinhard Karcher
2008-03-16  2:22   ` Eddy Setyawan
2008-03-16  7:23     ` Rafał Cygnarowski
2008-03-16 10:41 ` Frantisek Hanzlik
2008-03-16 13:35   ` Eddy Setyawan
2008-03-16 13:43     ` Eddy Setyawan
2008-04-01 18:33     ` Mike McCarty
2008-05-29 17:19   ` Eddy Setyawan
2008-05-30  3:53     ` Frantisek Hanzlik
2008-05-30  8:27     ` Frantisek Hanzlik
2008-05-30  8:40       ` Eddy Setyawan
2008-05-30  8:56         ` Frantisek Hanzlik
     [not found]           ` <34cfb2e90805300203t1f904938q60405bbbe3e035a2@mail.gmail.com>
2008-05-31  8:15             ` Frantisek Hanzlik [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48410933.4020101@hanzlici.cz \
    --to=franta@hanzlici.cz \
    --cc=eddymilis@teguhabadi.com \
    --cc=linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox