From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frantisek Hanzlik Subject: Re: Problem with dosemu Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 10:46:18 +0200 Message-ID: <53674FDA.60805@hanzlici.cz> References: <53323C56.4090205@earthlink.net> <5338674A.70108@hanzlici.cz> <5338A746.6030207@earthlink.net> <533919B4.7010809@hanzlici.cz> <534BFE2C.5080507@earthlink.net> <534C5FA3.2000407@hanzlici.cz> <534C984E.7070808@earthlink.net> <53557D37.8000007@hanzlici.cz> <5355D46F.7040309@earthlink.net> <5356E8BB.2010909@hanzlici.cz> <5357347D.1010401@earthlink.net> <5357665D.1020302@hanzlici.cz> <53580FB5.2070108@earthlink.net> <53662267.5080702@hanzlici.cz> <5366EFF3.6040904@earthlink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5366EFF3.6040904@earthlink.net> Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: DOSEMU/FreeDOS jankomEarthlink wrote: > CASE CLOSED, DOSEMU WORKS NOW! fine! >> 2) Your error message: '"/usr/share/dosemu/Xfonts": error scanning' >> is perhaps caused by fc-cache problem. What You obtain on command: >> fc-cache -v -f /usr/share/dosemu/Xfonts > /usr/share/dosemu/Xfonts: caching, new cache contents: 2 fonts, 0 dirs > /usr/local/var/cache/fontconfig: cleaning cache directory > /root/.cache/fontconfig: not cleaning non-existent cache directory > /root/.fontconfig: not cleaning non-existent cache directory > fc-cache: succeeded You should still make 'fc-cache -v -f' (without trailing path) for make sure that the 'error scanning' error is gone. >> It should be successfull and in '/usr/share/dosemu/Xfonts' directory >> should be created (empty) file 'fonts.cache-1'. >> You should also verify dosemu RPM package right installation by cmd: >> rpm -V dosemu >> On my PC it produce only one line (which is OK): >> .......T. /usr/share/dosemu/Xfonts/fonts.dir > My system produces no output. >> Also, are You using xfs - X font server? > Yes, see more below. >> >> Maybe You have somehow broken Your system - e.g. missing some files >> or directories, bad ownership or permissions on them etc. >> You can verify it by 'rpm -Va' command. This should not produce any >> serious problems (it is necessary assessed output individually). > rpm -Va xfs produces no output, 'rpm -Va xfs' is bad command. You must use 'rpm -V xorg-x11-xfs' for to verify Xorg xfs font server package, or 'rpm -Va' to verify all packages in whole system. And usually there are some 'errors' printed, even if everything is in order - mostly are reported changed config files (changed size, timestamp, md5/sha1 checksum etc.) Franta