From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergey Suleymanov Subject: Re: 1.1.4 incompatible with glibc 2.1 Date: 05 Jan 2003 09:10:09 +0300 Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <87vg14ktz2.fsf@boo.eatpbank.ru> References: <3E170002.3050800@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3E170002.3050800@yahoo.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Linux-MSDOS Mailing list >>>>> Stas Sergeev writes: Stas> Yes, I understand that this error means a missing Stas> definition. What am I trying to say is that it looks like a bug Stas> of a particular glibc version, so that no modifications to Stas> dosemu required at all, just "upgrade your glibc" message. Wow! :) That's sort of using a steam-hammer to crack nuts. Stas> We can always hardcode that size to 4, but what if midid will Stas> use IPv6 one day? :) Could you, btw, please search for that Stas> definition in the other headers? Nothing. Stas> I can't beleive it can be simply missing, after reading "man Stas> inet". I read it too. And saw just unsigned long int :) System is Debian 2.2 (Potato) Stas> It would be the best to add an in_addr_t check to configure and Stas> define it ourselves if it is missing, but probably this is just Stas> too much for such a small thing:) :) Well, 1.1.4 is a development release. I think when 1.2 is out glibc will be 5.x ;) -- Sergey Suleymanov