Is this project under control, or just 'suck it and see' ?

[easlab@absamail.co.za]

> > Both users want to print to their 
> > printers, and the printers are defined thru .dosemurc files in their 
> > home directories. Once I run both users under the same login name, they 
> > both use the same .dosemurc settings file and thus BOTH PRINT ON THE 
> > SAME NETWORK PRINTER! Running one of DOSEMU session from other home 
> > directory dosen't help either, because DOSEMU takes .dosemurc strictly 
> > from user's home directory and this way the printing is directed to only 
> > one printer.
> 
Bartos-Elekes Zsolt wrote:-
> See the -f parameter for dosemu.bin to use a different .dosemurc, and start 
> each dosemu client with a different .dosemurc, which contains only a line like
> $_printer = "rlp_1"

But where/how do I "See the -f parameter for dosemu.bin" ?
Is there applicable documentation with the binary-only package ?

Someone wrote:-
> > you seem to have multiple versions of dosemu lying around.  Better
> > do some clean-up.

Yes I too have multiple installations/versions. 
Still trying to drive par-port hex378 with a DOS-application.
Is the method of 'cleaning up' sytematically documented anywhere ?

How old is this project ?
Isn't it time that someone explained to the 'contributors' that
in scientific english "everywhere" is critically different from
"anywhere" ?       
"... the dosemu binaries can reside everywhere in the system.
..you can call dosemu from everywhere."    !!

Does any[not every]body KNOW how to drive port  hex378 under 
pre- ver. 1.1.99.1, or do you all just 'suck it and see' eg. "this works 
for me" ?   

== Chris Glur.