From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp2.crystaltech.com ([216.119.106.211]) by pentafluge.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.14 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 19IpL1-0007ps-Bc for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 13:38:27 +0100 From: "John Burch" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?'J=F6rn_Engel'?= Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 08:40:59 -0400 Message-ID: <000301c3205f$669ca630$1200a8c0@JOHNB> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20030521155703.GA30187@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: 'David Woodhouse' cc: 'Jonas Holmberg' cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: RE: Mtd block access (jffs2 formatted) and mtd char access(unformatted) on different partitions of a single flashdevice List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > >=20 > > Not that I know of. I think the best case scenario would=20 > be that all=20 > > AMD devices supported it - then only the manuf ID would have to be=20 > > checked. However, that would have to be confirmed by AMD. >=20 >=20 > If I read this correctly, AMD won't confirm your assumption. >=20 AMD has confirmed that all of their flash devices support the multiple sector erase capability as described in their datasheets under "Sector Erase Command Sequence". Note that it requires that any additional erase commands be written within 50us of the previous erase command.