From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailout4.samsung.com ([203.254.224.34]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1P3i9R-0002T6-St for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 04:32:25 +0000 Received: from epmmp1 (mailout4.samsung.com [203.254.224.34]) by mailout4.samsung.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTP id <0L9W00GC1KLIFL40@mailout4.samsung.com> for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:32:06 +0900 (KST) Received: from roh83 ([107.108.214.183]) by mmp1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0L9W00BU6KLF4Q@mmp1.samsung.com> for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:32:06 +0900 (KST) Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:02:02 +0530 From: Rohit Hassan Sathyanarayan Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND][MTD]MLC device check in OneNAND driver In-reply-to: <1285329124.29268.175.camel@localhost> To: dedekind1@gmail.com Message-id: <000f01cb65d8$984b15b0$c8e14110$%hs@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-language: en-us Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable References: <001701cb5bdd$3fd69a80$bf83cf80$%hs@samsung.com> <1285329124.29268.175.camel@localhost> Cc: v.dalal@samsung.com, gupta.raghav@samsung.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Artem, > -----Original Message----- > From: Artem Bityutskiy [mailto:dedekind1@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 5:22 PM > To: Rohit Hassan Sathyanarayan > Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; gupta.raghav@samsung.com; = v.dalal@samsung.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND][MTD]MLC device check in OneNAND driver >=20 > On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 17:10 +0530, Rohit Hassan Sathyanarayan wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Rohit HS > > Signed-off-by: Raghav Gupta >=20 > Almost perfect. However: >=20 > 1. All mtd patches should have "mtd:" prefix. > 2. Add some description about what you do and why into the commit > message. > 3. I think combining is not good, better do it old way - first patch > introduces the flag, second uses it in OneNAND >=20 We made changes as per your comments and have posted two patches, Links of two patches, = http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2010-September/032333.html= = http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2010-September/032334.html= =09 > Sorry for being picky, but I really want to show you how to send = patches > properly once and later get good series from you. >=20 > -- > Best Regards, > Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=90=D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC = =D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9)