From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 12-234-34-139.client.attbi.com ([12.234.34.139] helo=heavens.murgatroid.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 181F4p-00067R-00 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 00:56:47 +0100 Received: from bergamot (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by heavens.murgatroid.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6831F233A1 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:56:36 -0700 (PDT) From: "Christopher Hoover" To: "'linux-mtd'" Subject: Merge to 2.5? Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:56:33 -0700 Message-ID: <002401c273dd$53057b30$0c5f040f@bergamot> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Is there a plan to merge some branch of cvs to 2.5 before the big deadline? As it is, the 2.4 kernel is closer to mtd cvs than 2.5. For instance, 2.4 has the Intel C3 var-size-block patch yet 2.5 does not. Curious, -ch