From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lon-del-04.spheriq.net ([195.46.50.101]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1FgM30-0002YB-TZ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:27:39 -0400 Received: from lon-out-03.spheriq.net ([195.46.50.131]) by lon-del-04.spheriq.net with ESMTP id k4HDQYoU002654 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:26:34 GMT Received: from lon-cus-02.spheriq.net (lon-cus-02.spheriq.net [195.46.50.38]) by lon-out-03.spheriq.net with ESMTP id k4HDQXn2010512 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:26:33 GMT Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by lon-cus-02.spheriq.net with ESMTP id k4HDQUOH015512 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:26:32 GMT Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (ns2.st.com [164.129.230.9]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 77B09DA71 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:26:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.nap.st.com (mail1.nap.st.com [10.150.200.1]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 0323147441 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:25:35 +0000 (GMT) From: Davide CASCONE To: Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:25:34 +0200 Message-ID: <002801c679b5$60bd2d90$253682a4@nap.st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: JFFS2 on Sibley List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I'm working to support Sibley devices in Linux OS with the JFF2 file = system. I have patched my Linux 2.6.16 OS with the latest snapshot downloaded at = the following web address http://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/people/dwmw2/mtd/cvs/ After the boot, the Operating System mounts correctly the JFFS2 file = system on the Sibley device and it seems to work properly (for example, = a new file has been correctly created and/or deleted). But, when I = reboot the system, I can see some Warning Messages during the file = system mount phase: >Empty flash at 0x000cd808 ends at 0x000cdc00 >jffs2_scan_dirent_node(): Name CRC failed on node at 0x000cdfd8: Read=20 >0xebaf74d5, calculated 0x44660075 JFFS2 notice: (12) check_node_data: = wrong data CRC in data node at 0x000cf000: read 0xe49530c6, calculated = 0xe6751c2f. The file system still works properly. So, I have the following = questions:=20 1. Do you have some suggestion to solve my problem?=20 2. With my patch it seems that the headers are not correctly written. Do = you know anything about it?=20 3. Do you know if a most recent patch is available? Thanks in advance for any kind of support. Best Regards, Davide