From: "matsunaga" <matsunaga_kazuhisa@yahoo.co.jp>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>,
"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] 1/2 central workspace for zlib
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 00:15:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002901c32919$ddc37000$570486da@w0a3t0> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030530144959.GA4736@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de
> The following creates a central workspace per cpu for the zlib. The
> original idea was to save memory for embedded, but this should also
> improve performance for smp.
Hi
Thank you for the patch.
It definitely reduces resources and improve multiple CPU scalability.
But I still would like to stick to performance.
(Though I haven't evaluated the performance yet...)
So far I think MTD is used mostly on Embedded device,
in which single CPU which is not so powerful is used.
How is the following code (it is ugly though)?
static void default_workspace[WSIZE];
<snip>
size = MAX(sizeof(struct inflate_workspace),
sizeof(struct deflate_workspace));
if(WSIZE < size)
BUG();
zlib_workspace[0] = default_workspace;
for (i=1; i<smp_num_cpus; i++) {
zlib_workspace[i] = vmalloc(size);
if (!zlib_workspace[i]) {
zlib_exit();
return -ENOMEM;
}
}
P.S.
There is another vmalloc in mtdblock_open()...;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-02 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-30 14:49 [PATCH RFC] 1/2 central workspace for zlib Jörn Engel
2003-05-30 15:29 ` James Morris
2003-05-30 17:43 ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-31 0:14 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-31 6:48 ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-31 6:55 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-31 7:56 ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-31 7:59 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-31 8:11 ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-31 8:12 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-31 8:22 ` Con Kolivas
2003-06-01 1:25 ` Matt Mackall
2003-06-02 12:19 ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-31 9:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-05-31 6:20 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-31 10:51 ` James Morris
2003-05-31 11:07 ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-31 15:44 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2003-06-02 12:26 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-02 13:03 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2003-06-02 13:32 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-02 15:15 ` matsunaga [this message]
2003-06-02 15:36 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-02 15:40 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-02 15:53 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-02 15:59 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-02 16:37 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-02 19:36 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-02 20:54 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-02 16:07 ` matsunaga
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002901c32919$ddc37000$570486da@w0a3t0' \
--to=matsunaga_kazuhisa@yahoo.co.jp \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox