From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from maild.telia.com ([194.22.190.101]) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 18B0aQ-0007wf-00 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 22:29:46 +0000 Message-ID: <002b01c2890c$f2c058e0$0200a8c0@telia.com> From: "Joakim Tjernlund" To: "Wolfgang Denk" Cc: "Marc Singer" , References: <20021110224142.2F39310162@denx.denx.de> Subject: Re: crc32() optimization Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > In message <001301c28909$743f1f40$0200a8c0@telia.com> you wrote: > > I could not wait until tomorrow, so I did it now instead. > > The result was worse. The best I got was 7% improvement. > > I tried 16, 8, 6 and 4 as unrolling steps. > > Makes no sense to me. Should be at least as efficient as your > original code (marginally better). I don't understand this either. Anyone? Jocke