From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from msr29.hinet.net ([168.95.4.129] helo=msr.hinet.net) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 17phRN-0007fk-00 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 04:48:21 +0100 Received: from stevexp (61-219-230-90.HINET-IP.hinet.net [61.219.230.90]) by msr.hinet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA24859 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 11:48:17 +0800 (CST) From: "Steve Tsai" To: "Linux MTD mailing list" Subject: About GC Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 11:47:58 +0800 Message-ID: <002d01c25ad8$5a39d310$80d1a8c0@synso.com.tw> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: The recent CVS code has a great improvement at mounting time. It's great. I test it with the 32Mbytes NAND flash and the mounting time reduce to 10 seconds(the original time is 50 seconds). After mounting, I found that the GC thread will take the most CPU time(99.9) in my system for a while. How can I make jffs2_garbage_collection_pass to reduce CPU time? Steve Tsai