From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailf.telia.com ([194.22.194.25]) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16e1Al-0004RC-00 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 21:54:39 +0000 Message-ID: <002f01c1bb23$dfceb540$e0d9b5d4@jocke> From: "Joakim Tjernlund" To: , "David Woodhouse" Cc: References: <02022122583010.18560@thomas> Subject: Re: jffs2_scan_make_ino_cache() in scan.c very slow Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 23:05:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > On Thursday, 21. February 2002 15:34, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > > Sorry. Can you make sure it still applies to the current CVS tree and > > > resend it? > > Well, I not using the current CVS at the moment. It will take some time > > until I upgrade again. > > I tried it with current CVS and there is no difference without or with > optimizing. Mount time for a 8MB NAND partition in all variants ~11 sec. on a > 74MHz ARM7. What did you try? My cfi_cmd0001.c changes(I guess not, since you are on NAND) or the inode cache thing? Has someone else tried? results? Jocke