From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ns1.nougen.com ([216.185.81.251] helo=mail.nougen.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16c32w-0006ul-00 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 11:30:27 +0000 Message-ID: <003a01c1b6de$e88a0980$f801a8c0@minibm> From: "Chung Ming" Cc: References: Subject: Re: "No Flash Chips Recognized." error. Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 19:41:41 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi David, now I can't get any reply from this DoC millenium, no "DiskOnChip found at address.." anymore just "possible DoC with unknow chipID found at ....." . I wonder if DoC got damaged or they just keep using different flash? I will buy a new one and test again. Regards. Ming. ----- Original Message ----- From: David Woodhouse To: Chung Ming Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 9:58 PM Subject: Re: "No Flash Chips Recognized." error. On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Chung Ming wrote: > "DiskOnChip found at address 0xEE000" > No Flash Chips Recognized. Try this and tell me what it says... Index: doc2001.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/mtd/drivers/mtd/devices/doc2001.c,v retrieving revision 1.35 diff -u -r1.35 doc2001.c --- doc2001.c 2001/10/02 15:05:13 1.35 +++ doc2001.c 2002/02/11 14:02:35 @@ -228,8 +228,10 @@ } } - if (nand_flash_ids[i].name == NULL) + if (nand_flash_ids[i].name == NULL) { + printk("Chip with mfr %02x, id %02x unknown. Tell dwmw2\n"); return 0; + } else return 1; } -- dwmw2 ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/