From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailf.telia.com ([194.22.194.25]) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16e1Vr-0004W2-00 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 22:16:27 +0000 Message-ID: <004501c1bb26$eb668380$e0d9b5d4@jocke> From: "Joakim Tjernlund" To: , "David Woodhouse" Cc: References: <02022122583010.18560@thomas> <002f01c1bb23$dfceb540$e0d9b5d4@jocke> <02022123225211.18560@thomas> Subject: Re: jffs2_scan_make_ino_cache() in scan.c very slow Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 23:27:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > On Thursday, 21. February 2002 23:05, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > What did you try? My cfi_cmd0001.c changes(I guess not, since you are > > on NAND) or the inode cache thing? > the inode cache thing hmm, how big is your FS? Maybe, if you have a small FS the inode cache thing gets lost in "noise" from the NAND driver? My FS is 63 MB and df reports 31% used. Jocke