* Re: Trouble indetifying FLASH part
@ 2002-05-16 13:25 Ho-Kuo Chan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Ho-Kuo Chan @ 2002-05-16 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mtd
Hi,
I suppose I should mention that I am using kernel 2.4.19-pre3.
> It looks like what you have should work. What messages do you get when you
> boot?
Here is the outpt, note that lines that start with HKC are debugging
printk's I have put in:
physmap flash device: 4000000 at 8000000
HKC: output of ioremap: Map Priv 1 = 0xc2003000
HKC: Calling cfi_probe_chip with bus width 2, interleave 1 and device_type
16
HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Addr = 0x0
HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Cmd_addr = 0x0, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x1, type = 0x2
HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Val = 0xf0
HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Addr = 0xaa
HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Cmd_addr = 0x55, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x1, type = 0x2
HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Val = 0x98
CFI Query Failed for driver
HKC: Calling cfi_probe_chip with bus width 2, interleave 2 and device_type 8
HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Addr = 0x0
HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Cmd_addr = 0x0, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x2, type = 0x1
HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Val = 0xf0f0
HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Addr = 0xaa
Cmd_addr = 0x55, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x2, type = 0x1
HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Val = 0x9898
CFI Query Failed for driver
Calling cfi_probe_chip with bus width 2, interleave 2 and device_type 16
HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Addr = 0x0
HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Cmd_addr = 0x0, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x2, type = 0x2
HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Val = 0xf0f0
HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Addr = 0x154
HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Cmd_addr = 0x55, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x2, type = 0x2
HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Val = 0x9898
CFI Query Failed for driver
CFI: Found no Physically mapped flash device at location zero
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: Trouble indetifying FLASH part
@ 2002-05-16 6:53 Jim Zeus
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jim Zeus @ 2002-05-16 6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: all in MTD mailinglist; +Cc: Ho-Kuo Chan
--- "Ho-Kuo Chan" <hchan@wavesat.com> wrote:
> I have a PPC405GP based board with a single AMD compatible Toshiba
>TC58FVB321FT 4MB flash in word mode. The chip is physically mapped to
>address 0x8000000 and according to the Data Sheet, is CFI compatible. I
>believe I have properly configured the kernel but I can't seem to get my
>chip identified. Am I missing sonething? Any help is greatly appreciated!!
You should write own map code in maps directory.
Jim Zeus
_____________________________________________________________
Want a new web-based email account ? ---> http://www.firstlinux.net
_____________________________________________________________
Promote your group and strengthen ties to your members with email@yourgroup.org by Everyone.net http://www.everyone.net/?btn=tag
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread[parent not found: <001301c1fcd9$76792c40$0200010a@WT0136>]
* Trouble indetifying FLASH part @ 2002-05-15 20:50 ` Ho-Kuo Chan 2002-05-16 12:33 ` David Woodhouse 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Ho-Kuo Chan @ 2002-05-15 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-mtd Hi, I have a PPC405GP based board with a single AMD compatible Toshiba TC58FVB321FT 4MB flash in word mode. The chip is physically mapped to address 0x8000000 and according to the Data Sheet, is CFI compatible. I believe I have properly configured the kernel but I can't seem to get my chip identified. Am I missing sonething? Any help is greatly appreciated!! This is my config: # Memory Technology Devices (MTD) # CONFIG_MTD=y CONFIG_MTD_DEBUG=y CONFIG_MTD_DEBUG_VERBOSE=3 # CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS is not set # CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS is not set CONFIG_MTD_CHAR=y # CONFIG_MTD_BLOCK is not set # CONFIG_MTD_BLOCK_RO is not set CONFIG_FTL=y # CONFIG_NFTL is not set # # RAM/ROM/Flash chip drivers # CONFIG_MTD_CFI=y CONFIG_MTD_JEDECPROBE=y CONFIG_MTD_GEN_PROBE=y CONFIG_MTD_CFI_ADV_OPTIONS=y CONFIG_MTD_CFI_NOSWAP=y # CONFIG_MTD_CFI_BE_BYTE_SWAP is not set # CONFIG_MTD_CFI_LE_BYTE_SWAP is not set CONFIG_MTD_CFI_GEOMETRY=y CONFIG_MTD_CFI_B1=y CONFIG_MTD_CFI_B2=y CONFIG_MTD_CFI_B4=y CONFIG_MTD_CFI_I1=y CONFIG_MTD_CFI_I2=y # CONFIG_MTD_CFI_I4 is not set # CONFIG_MTD_CFI_INTELEXT is not set CONFIG_MTD_CFI_AMDSTD=y CONFIG_MTD_RAM=y CONFIG_MTD_ROM=y CONFIG_MTD_ABSENT=y CONFIG_MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS=y CONFIG_MTD_AMDSTD=y # CONFIG_MTD_SHARP is not set CONFIG_MTD_JEDEC=y # # Mapping drivers for chip access # CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP=y CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_START=0x8000000 CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_LEN=0x4000000 CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_BUSWIDTH=2 # CONFIG_MTD_TQM8XXL is not set # CONFIG_MTD_RPXLITE is not set # CONFIG_MTD_DBOX2 is not set # CONFIG_MTD_CFI_FLAGADM is not set # CONFIG_MTD_REDWOOD is not set # # Self-contained MTD device drivers # # CONFIG_MTD_PMC551 is not set # CONFIG_MTD_SLRAM is not set # CONFIG_MTD_MTDRAM is not set # CONFIG_MTD_BLKMTD is not set # CONFIG_MTD_DOC1000 is not set # CONFIG_MTD_DOC2000 is not set # CONFIG_MTD_DOC2001 is not set # CONFIG_MTD_DOCPROBE is not set # # NAND Flash Device Drivers # # CONFIG_MTD_NAND is not set Ho-Kuo Chan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Trouble indetifying FLASH part 2002-05-15 20:50 ` Ho-Kuo Chan @ 2002-05-16 12:33 ` David Woodhouse [not found] ` <5240.1021554647@redhat.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: David Woodhouse @ 2002-05-16 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ho-Kuo Chan; +Cc: linux-mtd hchan@wavesat.com said: > I believe I have properly configured the kernel but I can't seem to > get my chip identified. Am I missing sonething? Any help is greatly > appreciated!! It looks like what you have should work. What messages do you get when you boot? -- dwmw2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <5240.1021554647@redhat.com>]
* Re: Trouble indetifying FLASH part [not found] ` <5240.1021554647@redhat.com> @ 2002-05-16 13:36 ` Ho-Kuo Chan 2002-05-16 13:37 ` David Woodhouse 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Ho-Kuo Chan @ 2002-05-16 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Woodhouse; +Cc: linux-mtd Hi, I turned on LE_BYTE_SWAP as you requested, with similar results: physmap flash device: 4000000 at 8000000 HKC: output of ioremap: Map Priv 1 = 0xc2003000 HKC: Calling cfi_probe_chip with bus width 2, interleave 1 and device_type 16 HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Addr = 0x0 HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Cmd_addr = 0x0, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x1, type = 0x2 HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Val = 0xf000 HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Addr = 0xaa HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Cmd_addr = 0x55, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x1, type = 0x2 HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Val = 0x9800 CFI Query Failed for driver HKC: Calling cfi_probe_chip with bus width 2, interleave 2 and device_type 8 HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Addr = 0x0 HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Cmd_addr = 0x0, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x2, type = 0x1 HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Val = 0xf0f0 HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Addr = 0xaa HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Cmd_addr = 0x55, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x2, type = 0x1 HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Val = 0x9898 CFI Query Failed for driver HKC: Calling cfi_probe_chip with bus width 2, interleave 2 and device_type 16 HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Addr = 0x0 HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Cmd_addr = 0x0, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x2, type = 0x2 HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Val = 0xf0f0 HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Addr = 0x154 HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Cmd_addr = 0x55, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x2, type = 0x2 HKC: cfi_send_gen_cmd: Val = 0x9898 CFI Query Failed for driver CFI: Found no Physically mapped flash device at location zero I have also tried replacing the ioremap call in init)physmap with ioremap_nocache() but with no byte swapping. Should I try it with LE_BYTE_SWAP? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Trouble indetifying FLASH part 2002-05-16 13:36 ` Ho-Kuo Chan @ 2002-05-16 13:37 ` David Woodhouse 2002-05-16 14:12 ` Ho-Kuo Chan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: David Woodhouse @ 2002-05-16 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ho-Kuo Chan; +Cc: linux-mtd hchan@wavesat.com said: > I have also tried replacing the ioremap call in init)physmap with > ioremap_nocache() but with no byte swapping. Should I try it with > LE_BYTE_SWAP? Yes, that could be useful -- although I don't think you should have got a cached mapping by default, it's worth a try. Can you make it print the contents of the region at 0x8000000 and check it matches what you expect to be in the flash chip? Are you sure that's supposed to be 0x8000000 and not 0x80000000? -- dwmw2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Trouble indetifying FLASH part 2002-05-16 13:37 ` David Woodhouse @ 2002-05-16 14:12 ` Ho-Kuo Chan 2002-05-16 14:15 ` David Woodhouse 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Ho-Kuo Chan @ 2002-05-16 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Woodhouse; +Cc: linux-mtd > > I have also tried replacing the ioremap call in init)physmap with > > ioremap_nocache() but with no byte swapping. Should I try it with > > LE_BYTE_SWAP? > > Yes, that could be useful -- although I don't think you should have got a > cached mapping by default, it's worth a try. The ioremap_nocache with LE_BYTE_SWAP didn't help. I will return it ioremap. > > Can you make it print the contents of the region at 0x8000000 and check it > matches what you expect to be in the flash chip? I tried printk("HKC: Raw output of flash address =0x%x\n", *(unsigned int*)0x8000000) but resulted in kernel panic. I'm starting to think this is a virtual memory problem. Do I need a TLB entry for the device? > Are you sure that's > supposed to be 0x8000000 and not 0x80000000? Yes, I have double-checked the hardware specs. I also have the board and flash working with VxWorks which has a flat memory model. Any other ideas? Thanks. HK ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Trouble indetifying FLASH part 2002-05-16 14:12 ` Ho-Kuo Chan @ 2002-05-16 14:15 ` David Woodhouse 2002-05-16 14:52 ` Ho-Kuo Chan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: David Woodhouse @ 2002-05-16 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ho-Kuo Chan; +Cc: linux-mtd hchan@wavesat.com said: > I tried printk("HKC: Raw output of flash address =0x%x\n", *(unsigned > int*)0x8000000) but resulted in kernel panic. I'm starting to think > this is a virtual memory problem. Do I need a TLB entry for the > device? Yes. That's what ioremap() does for you. But the map driver will already be setting that up -- just call the map->copy_from function in the chip probe, to read the first 0x40-odd bytes into a buffer, and then print them and compare with what you expected to see. -- dwmw2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Trouble indetifying FLASH part 2002-05-16 14:15 ` David Woodhouse @ 2002-05-16 14:52 ` Ho-Kuo Chan 2002-05-16 15:01 ` David Woodhouse 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Ho-Kuo Chan @ 2002-05-16 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Woodhouse; +Cc: linux-mtd David Woodhouse wrote: > Yes. That's what ioremap() does for you. But the map driver will already be > setting that up -- just call the map->copy_from function in the chip probe, > to read the first 0x40-odd bytes into a buffer, and then print them and > compare with what you expected to see. OK, this is what I did: char buffer[0x40]; map->copy_from(map, (void*)buffer, 0, 0x40); for (i = 0; i < 0x40; i++) { printk("HKC: map->copy_from copied 0x%x to buffer\n", buffer[i]; } The result was a continuous stream of 0xf0's. In VxWorks I get 0x1303434953463900 which is "..CIS59.". Does this tell you anything? HK ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Trouble indetifying FLASH part 2002-05-16 14:52 ` Ho-Kuo Chan @ 2002-05-16 15:01 ` David Woodhouse 2002-05-16 17:37 ` Ho-Kuo Chan 2002-05-23 21:19 ` Ho-Kuo Chan 0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: David Woodhouse @ 2002-05-16 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ho-Kuo Chan; +Cc: linux-mtd hchan@wavesat.com said: > The result was a continuous stream of 0xf0's. In VxWorks I get > 0x1303434953463900 which is "..CIS59.". Does this tell you anything? Yeah. It really does look like the chip isn't where you think it is. Can you get Linux to boot anyway, with NFSroot or something? od -A x -t x1 /dev/mem | grep "13 03 43 49 53 46 39 00" Or you could code the equivalent in the kernel. -- dwmw2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Trouble indetifying FLASH part 2002-05-16 15:01 ` David Woodhouse @ 2002-05-16 17:37 ` Ho-Kuo Chan 2002-05-23 21:19 ` Ho-Kuo Chan 1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Ho-Kuo Chan @ 2002-05-16 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Woodhouse; +Cc: linux-mtd dwmw2 wrote: > Yeah. It really does look like the chip isn't where you think it is. > > Can you get Linux to boot anyway, with NFSroot or something? > > od -A x -t x1 /dev/mem | grep "13 03 43 49 53 46 39 00" I am booting over tftp with nfs mounted root already. I executed the command you provided at the console with no matches. I noted that the highest memory address tested was ffffff which makes sense considering the system has 16 MB RAM. Here is my physical memory map: 0x0 - 0xfffff : SDRAM 0x8000000 - 0x83FFFFF : Flash 0x9000000 - 0x90FFFFF : FPGA 0xEF600000 - 0xEFFFFFF : PPC405GP memory mapped registers 0xFFE00000 - 0xFFFFFFFF : BootPROM Does this help? Thanks again, HK ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Trouble indetifying FLASH part 2002-05-16 15:01 ` David Woodhouse 2002-05-16 17:37 ` Ho-Kuo Chan @ 2002-05-23 21:19 ` Ho-Kuo Chan 2002-05-23 21:44 ` David Woodhouse 1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Ho-Kuo Chan @ 2002-05-23 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Woodhouse; +Cc: linux-mtd Hi David, I have partially solved the problem. The PPC405GP multiplexes its GPIO lines with the External Bus Chip Select lines. In fact, what was occurring was that my GPIO's were misconfigured and were not acting as Chip Select Lines. However, it's not quite working: physmap flash device: 400000 at 8000000 HKC: Map Priv 1 = 0xc2003000 HKC: Calling cfi_probe_chip with bus width 2, interleave 2 and device_type 8 HKC: Output Reg: 0x45480000 -------> Correct value HKC: TCR: 0x750a0000 -------> Correct value HKC: ODR: 0x20000 -------> Correct value Control 0: 0x17ee616 -------> Correct value Addr = 0x0 Cmd_addr = 0x0, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x2, type = 0x1 Val = 0xf0f0 Addr = 0xaa Cmd_addr = 0x55, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x2, type = 0x1 Val = 0x9898 Read 0x=51, cmd = 0x5151 -----> the correct value is read, but it is being compared to a value returned by cfi_build_cmd('Q',map,cfi) in qry_present Read 0x=52, cmd = 0x5252 Read = 0x59, cmd = 0x5959 CFI Query Failed for driver Calling cfi_probe_chip with bus width 2, interleave 2 and device_type 16 Output Reg: 0x45480000 TCR: 0x750a0000 ODR: 0x20000 Control 0: 0x17ee616 Addr = 0x0 Cmd_addr = 0x0, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x2, type = 0x2 Val = 0xf0f0 Addr = 0x154 Cmd_addr = 0x55, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x2, type = 0x2 Val = 0x9898 Read 0x=ffff, cmd = 0x5151 Read 0x=3000, cmd = 0x5252 Read = 0x3000, cmd = 0x5959 CFI Query Failed for driver CFI: Found no Physically mapped flash device at location zero The value read above is the return value of cfi_read as in the qry_present function. I am no expert but should the comparison in qry_present: if (cfi_read(map, base+osf*0x10)==cfi_buil_cmd('Q', map, cfi) && cfi_read(map, base+osf*0x11)==cfi_buil_cmd('R', map, cfi) && cfi_read(map, base+osf*0x12)==cfi_buil_cmd('Y', map, cfi)) be simply: if (cfi_read(map, base+osf*0x10)=='Q' && cfi_read(map, base+osf*0x11)=='R' && cfi_read(map, base+osf*0x12)=='Y') Thanks for all your help!!!! Ho-Kuo Chan Software Designer, Digital Division Wavesat Wireless Inc. (514) 956-6322 ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org> To: "Ho-Kuo Chan" <hchan@wavesat.com> Cc: <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:01 AM Subject: Re: Trouble indetifying FLASH part > > hchan@wavesat.com said: > > The result was a continuous stream of 0xf0's. In VxWorks I get > > 0x1303434953463900 which is "..CIS59.". Does this tell you anything? > > Yeah. It really does look like the chip isn't where you think it is. > > Can you get Linux to boot anyway, with NFSroot or something? > > od -A x -t x1 /dev/mem | grep "13 03 43 49 53 46 39 00" > > Or you could code the equivalent in the kernel. > > -- > dwmw2 > > > > ______________________________________________________ > Linux MTD discussion mailing list > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Trouble indetifying FLASH part 2002-05-23 21:19 ` Ho-Kuo Chan @ 2002-05-23 21:44 ` David Woodhouse 2002-05-24 14:09 ` Ho-Kuo Chan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: David Woodhouse @ 2002-05-23 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ho-Kuo Chan; +Cc: linux-mtd hchan@wavesat.com said: > Calling cfi_probe_chip with bus width 2, interleave 2 and device_type 8 > Calling cfi_probe_chip with bus width 2, interleave 2 and device_type 16 What you have is a single chip, isn't it? Why does it never probe for bus width 2, interleave 1 and device_type 16? -- dwmw2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Trouble indetifying FLASH part 2002-05-23 21:44 ` David Woodhouse @ 2002-05-24 14:09 ` Ho-Kuo Chan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Ho-Kuo Chan @ 2002-05-24 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Woodhouse; +Cc: linux-mtd Hi David, > hchan@wavesat.com said: > > Calling cfi_probe_chip with bus width 2, interleave 2 and device_type 8 > > Calling cfi_probe_chip with bus width 2, interleave 2 and device_type 16 > > What you have is a single chip, isn't it? > > Why does it never probe for bus width 2, interleave 1 and device_type 16? > > -- > dwmw2 Ooops, sorry, I missed part of the copy/paste. This is the result with interleave at 1 with device_type 16: Calling cfi_probe_chip with bus width 2, interleave 1 and device_type 16 Output Reg: 0x45480000 TCR: 0x750a0000 ODR: 0x20000 Control 0: 0x17ee616 Addr = 0x0 Cmd_addr = 0x0, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x1, type = 0x2 Val = 0xf000 Addr = 0xaa Cmd_addr = 0x55, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x1, type = 0x2 Val = 0x9800 Read 0x=0, cmd = 0x5100 Read 0x=100, cmd = 0x5200 Read = 0x3e00, cmd = 0x5900 CFI Query Failed for driver Something just occurred to me: the calculated cmd values are endian swapped. I just checked and LE_BYTE_SWAP is still on, I have just turned it off and the device is now recognied: Calling cfi_probe_chip with bus width 2, interleave 1 and device_type 16 Output Reg: 0x45480000 TCR: 0x750a0000 ODR: 0x20000 Control 0: 0x17ee616 Addr = 0x0 Cmd_addr = 0x0, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x1, type = 0x2 Val = 0xf0 Addr = 0xaa Cmd_addr = 0x55, CFIDEV_INTERLEAVE = 0x1, type = 0x2 Val = 0x98 Read 0x=51, cmd = 0x51 Read 0x=52, cmd = 0x52 Read = 0x59, cmd = 0x59 Number of erase regions: 2 Primary Vendor Command Set: 0002 (AMD/Fujitsu Standard) Primary Algorithm Table at 0040 Alternative Vendor Command Set: 0000 (None) No Alternate Algorithm Table Vcc Minimum: 2.7 V Vcc Maximum: 3.6 V No Vpp line Typical byte/word write timeout: 16 µs Maximum byte/word write timeout: 512 µs Full buffer write not supported Typical block erase timeout: 1024 µs Maximum block erase timeout: 16384 µs Chip erase not supported Device size: 0x400000 bytes (4 MiB) Flash Device Interface description: 0x0002 - supports x8 and x16 via BYTE# with asynchronous interface Max. bytes in buffer write: 0x1 Number of Erase Block Regions: 2 Erase Region #0: BlockSize 0x2000 bytes, 8 blocks Erase Region #1: BlockSize 0x10000 bytes, 63 blocks <snip> number of CFI chips: 1 mtd: Giving out device 0 to Physically mapped flash Thanks for your help!!!! HK ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-24 14:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-16 13:25 Trouble indetifying FLASH part Ho-Kuo Chan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-16 6:53 Jim Zeus
[not found] <001301c1fcd9$76792c40$0200010a@WT0136>
2002-05-15 20:50 ` Ho-Kuo Chan
2002-05-16 12:33 ` David Woodhouse
[not found] ` <5240.1021554647@redhat.com>
2002-05-16 13:36 ` Ho-Kuo Chan
2002-05-16 13:37 ` David Woodhouse
2002-05-16 14:12 ` Ho-Kuo Chan
2002-05-16 14:15 ` David Woodhouse
2002-05-16 14:52 ` Ho-Kuo Chan
2002-05-16 15:01 ` David Woodhouse
2002-05-16 17:37 ` Ho-Kuo Chan
2002-05-23 21:19 ` Ho-Kuo Chan
2002-05-23 21:44 ` David Woodhouse
2002-05-24 14:09 ` Ho-Kuo Chan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox