From: "matsunaga" <matsunaga_kazuhisa@yahoo.co.jp>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] 1/2 central workspace for zlib
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 01:07:20 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <006001c32921$0be01400$570486da@w0a3t0> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030602153656.GA679@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de
> Not bad. We can even do a little better. Since only one workspace is
> really absolutely necessary (ignoring the siftirq case), there is no
> need to fail anymore. If we don't get enough memory for all
> workspaces, initialize the semaphore to be a little lower and live
> with fewer workspaces.
>
> I like your ideas, really! :)
Thanks.
> ...that is not trivial to get rid of. Image the case where two
> processes are writing to two devices. With two buffers, we do rmew
> whenever switching blocks for one device. With one buffer, we have to
> do it for every context switch between those two processes, which will
> wear down the flash a lot faster.
>
> Considering that mtdblock should not be performance critical in
> production use anyway, this is a very hard problem. What do you
> think?
I understand the difficulty. It is difficult to be hard coded for multi devices.
There maybe other things to be modified to improve perforamance.
BR.
Matsunaga
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-02 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-30 14:49 [PATCH RFC] 1/2 central workspace for zlib Jörn Engel
2003-05-30 15:29 ` James Morris
2003-05-30 17:43 ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-31 0:14 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-31 6:48 ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-31 6:55 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-31 7:56 ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-31 7:59 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-31 8:11 ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-31 8:12 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-31 8:22 ` Con Kolivas
2003-06-01 1:25 ` Matt Mackall
2003-06-02 12:19 ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-31 9:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-05-31 6:20 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-31 10:51 ` James Morris
2003-05-31 11:07 ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-31 15:44 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2003-06-02 12:26 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-02 13:03 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2003-06-02 13:32 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-02 15:15 ` matsunaga
2003-06-02 15:36 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-02 15:40 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-02 15:53 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-02 15:59 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-02 16:37 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-02 19:36 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-02 20:54 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-02 16:07 ` matsunaga [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='006001c32921$0be01400$570486da@w0a3t0' \
--to=matsunaga_kazuhisa@yahoo.co.jp \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox