From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qc0-f169.google.com ([209.85.216.169]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Xt0Rw-0007dG-H8 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:41:33 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id w7so7518810qcr.14 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 12:41:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from rodcwin7 (50-76-112-141-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.76.112.141]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f65sm12817300qga.9.2014.11.24.12.41.08 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Nov 2014 12:41:09 -0800 (PST) From: Rod Campbell To: Subject: Read-only file systems using NAND/MTD Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 15:41:08 -0500 Message-ID: <006d01d00826$fa33c2a0$ee9b47e0$@TelosAlliance.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-us List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello, Is there an update about implementing a read-only file system on NAND? The most recent discussion I could find was from May 2012: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2012-May/041200.html The conclusion seemed to be to use ubi underneath something like squashfs to provide bad-block awareness. Is this still the recommended solution? Thanks, Rod Campbell >>From the desk of: Rod Campbell Senior Software Engineer Linear Acoustic Inc. 108 Foxshire Drive, Lancaster PA 17601 Tel: 717-735-3611 Fax: 717-735-3612 E-mail: Rod.Campbell@TelosAlliance.com www.linearacoustic.com