From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from kynes.gatewest.net ([198.163.227.7]) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16ZIYO-0003J0-00 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2002 21:27:33 +0000 Received: from yahweh (h24-66-30-3.wp.shawcable.net [24.66.30.3]) by kynes.gatewest.net (8.12.1/8.12.0.Beta19/Debian 8.12.0.Beta19) with SMTP id g18LcfQ5019375 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:38:41 -0600 Message-ID: <007701c1b0e8$c90a9620$87657bc8@athlon> From: "Derek Ross" To: Subject: Is realtime logging possible? Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:37:19 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hello, Our product will have a slow-realtime logging component in it, and I'm trying to find out if flash will be capable of handling it. We'll be logging about 6 bytes once a second into flash. The maximum blocking duration for a write should be 0.1 second or less. I understand that sector erases in flash take lots of time, but it's possible to do erases in the background, so that if you organize the writes not to interfere with the erases (always different sectors) you won't have long blocking issues. The technical details are: CDB89712 (rev B) development board. Flash TE28F320 B Jedec, not CFI Will later be using C for final product, which is CFI Kernel is 2.4.6-rmk1-rayl1, and we also have 2.4.16-rmk2 We can upgrade mtd drivers if necessary. Thanks, Derek Ross.