From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:15:04 +0900 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [PATCH] S5PC110: Add OneNAND interrupt number In-reply-to: To: 'Kyungmin Park' , dedekind1@gmail.com Message-id: <009301cb3465$8df1b3c0$a9d51b40$%kim@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-language: ko Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable References: <20100727103937.GA1247@july> <1280982776.4363.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Kyungmin Park wrote: >=20 > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 19:39 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > >> To use OneNAND interrupt at drivers, also extend DMA address to = cover fully. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park > >> --- > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/dev-onenand.c b/arch/arm/mach- > s5pv210/dev-onenand.c > >> index 34997b7..f8ede33 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/dev-onenand.c > >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/dev-onenand.c > >> @@ -27,9 +27,14 @@ static struct resource = s5pc110_onenand_resources[] =3D { > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 }, > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 [1] =3D { > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 .start =A0=3D S5PC110_PA_ONENAND_DMA, > >> - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 .end =A0 =A0=3D S5PC110_PA_ONENAND_DMA + = SZ_2K - 1, > >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 .end =A0 =A0=3D S5PC110_PA_ONENAND_DMA + = SZ_8K - 1, > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 .flags =A0=3D IORESOURCE_MEM, > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 }, > >> + =A0 =A0 [2] =3D { > >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 .start =A0=3D IRQ_ONENAND_AUDI, > >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 .end =A0 =A0=3D IRQ_ONENAND_AUDI, > >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 .flags =A0=3D IORESOURCE_IRQ, > >> + =A0 =A0 }, > >> =A0}; > > > > You do not expect this to go through the MTD tree, right? >=20 > After this patch, I did a lot of works but failed to persuade the = Kukjin. Maybe I missed this single patch...looks ok itself. > At this time. it's okay only this patch to mtd tree. >=20 I think, it's better this patch is going to upstream through ARM tree. Artem, I will apply in my tree. Thanks. > Kukjin, are you okay? > Since It's only affect the c110. >=20 Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.