From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from majordomo by infradead.org with local (Exim 3.20 #2) id 14psVv-0005Po-00 for mtd-list@infradead.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:00:59 +0100 From: Robert Kaiser Reply-To: rob@sysgo.de To: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: Elan SC520 - problem with MTD Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:50:43 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain References: <3ADC62AE.66B350ED@daniel.com> <22300.987516491@redhat.com> <5360.987524764@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5360.987524764@redhat.com> Cc: Vipin Malik , Alexander Melichenko , mtd@infradead.org, mark.langsdorf@amd.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01041816004001.00407@rob> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-mtd@infradead.org List-ID: On Die, 17 Apr 2001 you wrote: > OK, so it's likely that the two drivers use different addresses just > because they expect the board to have been set up differently? [Assuming by the "two drivers" you mean the e520.c file by AMD and my sc520cdp.c in MTD CVS] Probably not: The e520.c expects the flash at physical address 0x2000000, where the SC520 CDP board potentially has RAM. Rob ---------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Kaiser email: rkaiser@sysgo.de SYSGO RTS GmbH Am Pfaffenstein 14 phone: (49) 6136 9948-762 D-55270 Klein-Winternheim / Germany fax: (49) 6136 9948-10 To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo@infradead.org