* [PATCH v2 0/2] Realtek ECC engine
@ 2025-08-28 14:34 Markus Stockhausen
2025-08-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: Add realtek,rtl9301-ecc Markus Stockhausen
2025-08-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: realtek-ecc: Add Realtek external ECC engine support Markus Stockhausen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Markus Stockhausen @ 2025-08-28 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: miquel.raynal, richard, vigneshr, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
linux-mtd, devicetree
This series adds support for the ECC engine on Realtek RTL93xx switch SoCs.
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: Add realtek,rtl9301-ecc
2025-08-28 14:34 [PATCH v2 0/2] Realtek ECC engine Markus Stockhausen
@ 2025-08-28 14:34 ` Markus Stockhausen
2025-09-01 5:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-10 8:45 ` Miquel Raynal
2025-08-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: realtek-ecc: Add Realtek external ECC engine support Markus Stockhausen
1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Markus Stockhausen @ 2025-08-28 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: miquel.raynal, richard, vigneshr, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
linux-mtd, devicetree
Cc: Markus Stockhausen
Add a dtschema for the ECC engine on the Realtek RTL93xx SoCs.
The engine supports BCH6 and BCH12 parity for 512 byte blocks.
Signed-off-by: Markus Stockhausen <markus.stockhausen@gmx.de>
---
Changes in v2:
- change cells from 2 to 1 (only 32 bit hardware)
---
.../bindings/mtd/realtek,rtl9301-ecc.yaml | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/realtek,rtl9301-ecc.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/realtek,rtl9301-ecc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/realtek,rtl9301-ecc.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1b34d79007a4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/realtek,rtl9301-ecc.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mtd/realtek,rtl9301-ecc.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Realtek SoCs NAND ECC engine
+
+maintainers:
+ - Markus Stockhausen <markus.stockhausen@gmx.de>
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ const: realtek,rtl9301-ecc
+
+ reg:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+required:
+ - compatible
+ - reg
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+ - |
+ soc {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+
+ ecc0: ecc@1a600 {
+ compatible = "realtek,rtl9301-ecc";
+ reg = <0x1a600 0x54>;
+ };
+ };
--
2.47.0
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: realtek-ecc: Add Realtek external ECC engine support
2025-08-28 14:34 [PATCH v2 0/2] Realtek ECC engine Markus Stockhausen
2025-08-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: Add realtek,rtl9301-ecc Markus Stockhausen
@ 2025-08-28 14:34 ` Markus Stockhausen
2025-09-10 8:43 ` Miquel Raynal
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Markus Stockhausen @ 2025-08-28 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: miquel.raynal, richard, vigneshr, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
linux-mtd, devicetree
Cc: Markus Stockhausen
The Realtek RTl93xx switch SoC series has a built in ECC controller
that can provide BCH6 or BCH12 over 512 data and 6 tag bytes. It
generates 10 (BCH6) or 20 (BCH12) bytes of parity.
This engine will most likely work in conjunction with the Realtek
spi-mem based NAND controller but can work on its own. Therefore
the initial implementation will be of type external.
Remark! The engine can support any data blocks that are multiples
of 512 bytes. For now limit it to data+oob layouts that have been
analyzed from existing devices. This way it keeps compatibility
and pre-existing vendor data can be read.
Signed-off-by: Markus Stockhausen <markus.stockhausen@gmx.de>
---
Changes in v2:
- include bitfield.h
- fill mtd->ecc_stats.corrected
- Reduce chattiness with dev_dbg()
- Convert return codes from context based to function based
- Add more documentation about vendor specifications
- Convert variables from vendor style to kernel style (e.g. tag)
---
drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig | 8 +
drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-realtek.c | 457 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 466 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-realtek.c
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig
index 5b0c2c95f10c..4a17271076bc 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig
@@ -61,6 +61,14 @@ config MTD_NAND_ECC_MEDIATEK
help
This enables support for the hardware ECC engine from Mediatek.
+config MTD_NAND_ECC_REALTEK
+ tristate "Realtek RTL93xx hardware ECC engine"
+ depends on HAS_IOMEM
+ depends on MACH_REALTEK_RTL || COMPILE_TEST
+ select MTD_NAND_ECC
+ help
+ This enables support for the hardware ECC engine from Realtek.
+
endmenu
endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile b/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile
index 44913ff1bf12..2e0e56267718 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
nandcore-objs := core.o bbt.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_CORE) += nandcore.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_MEDIATEK) += ecc-mtk.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_REALTEK) += ecc-realtek.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_QPIC_SNAND) += qpic_common.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_QCOM) += qpic_common.o
obj-y += onenand/
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-realtek.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-realtek.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4cbef7ca2c59
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/ecc-realtek.c
@@ -0,0 +1,457 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Support for Realtek hardware ECC engine in RTL93xx SoCs
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
+#include <linux/mtd/nand.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+
+/*
+ * The Realtek ECC engine has two operation modes.
+ *
+ * - BCH6 : Generate 10 ECC bytes from 512 data bytes plus 6 free bytes
+ * - BCH12 : Generate 20 ECC bytes from 512 data bytes plus 6 free bytes
+ *
+ * It can run for arbitrary NAND flash chips with different block and OOB sizes. Currently there
+ * are only two known devices in the wild that have NAND flash and make use of this ECC engine
+ * (Linksys LGS328C & LGS352C). To keep compatibility with vendor firmware, new modes can only
+ * be added when new data layouts have been analyzed. For now allow BCH6 on flash with 2048 byte
+ * blocks and 64 bytes oob.
+ *
+ * This driver aligns with kernel ECC naming conventions. Neverthless a short notice on the
+ * Realtek naming conventions for the different structures in the OOB area.
+ *
+ * - BBI : Bad block indicator. The first two bytes of OOB. Protected by ECC!
+ * - tag : 6 User/free bytes. First tag "contains" 2 bytes BBI. Protected by ECC!
+ * - syndrome : ECC/parity bytes
+ *
+ * Altogether this gives currently the following block layout.
+ *
+ * +------+------+------+------+-----+------+------+------+------+-----+-----+-----+-----+
+ * | 512 | 512 | 512 | 512 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
+ * +------+------+------+------+-----+------+------+------+------+-----+-----+-----+-----+
+ * | data | data | data | data | BBI | free | free | free | free | ECC | ECC | ECC | ECC |
+ * +------+------+------+------+-----+------+------+------+------+-----+-----+-----+-----+
+ */
+
+#define RTL_ECC_ALLOWED_PAGE_SIZE 2048
+#define RTL_ECC_ALLOWED_OOB_SIZE 64
+#define RTL_ECC_ALLOWED_STRENGTH 6
+
+#define RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE 512
+#define RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE 6
+#define RTL_ECC_PARITY_SIZE_BCH6 10
+#define RTL_ECC_PARITY_SIZE_BCH12 20
+
+/*
+ * The engine is fed with two DMA regions. One for data (always 512 bytes) and one for free bytes
+ * and parity (either 16 bytes for BCH6 or 26 bytes for BCH12). Start and length of each must be
+ * aligned to a multiple of 4.
+ */
+
+#define RTL_ECC_DMA_FREE_PARITY_SIZE ALIGN(RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE + RTL_ECC_PARITY_SIZE_BCH12, 4)
+#define RTL_ECC_DMA_SIZE (RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE + RTL_ECC_DMA_FREE_PARITY_SIZE)
+
+#define RTL_ECC_CFG 0x00
+#define RTL_ECC_BCH6 0
+#define RTL_ECC_BCH12 BIT(28)
+#define RTL_ECC_DMA_PRECISE BIT(12)
+#define RTL_ECC_BURST_128 GENMASK(1, 0)
+#define RTL_ECC_DMA_TRIGGER 0x08
+#define RTL_ECC_OP_DECODE 0
+#define RTL_ECC_OP_ENCODE BIT(0)
+#define RTL_ECC_DMA_START 0x0c
+#define RTL_ECC_DMA_TAG 0x10
+#define RTL_ECC_STATUS 0x14
+#define RTL_ECC_CORR_COUNT GENMASK(19, 12)
+#define RTL_ECC_RESULT BIT(8)
+#define RTL_ECC_ALL_ONE BIT(4)
+#define RTL_ECC_OP_STATUS BIT(0)
+
+struct rtl_ecc_engine {
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct nand_ecc_engine engine;
+ struct mutex lock;
+ char *buf;
+ dma_addr_t buf_dma;
+ struct regmap *regmap;
+};
+
+struct rtl_ecc_ctx {
+ struct rtl_ecc_engine * rtlc;
+ struct nand_ecc_req_tweak_ctx req_ctx;
+ int steps;
+ int bch_mode;
+ int parity_size;
+};
+
+static const struct regmap_config rtl_ecc_regmap_config = {
+ .reg_bits = 32,
+ .val_bits = 32,
+ .reg_stride = 4,
+};
+
+static inline void *nand_to_ctx(struct nand_device *nand)
+{
+ return nand->ecc.ctx.priv;
+}
+
+static inline struct rtl_ecc_engine *nand_to_rtlc(struct nand_device *nand)
+{
+ struct nand_ecc_engine *eng = nand->ecc.engine;
+
+ return container_of(eng, struct rtl_ecc_engine, engine);
+}
+
+static int rtl_ecc_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
+ struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
+{
+ struct nand_device *nand = mtd_to_nanddev(mtd);
+ struct rtl_ecc_ctx *ctx = nand_to_ctx(nand);
+
+ if (section < 0 || section >= ctx->steps)
+ return -ERANGE;
+
+ oobregion->offset = ctx->steps * RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE + section * ctx->parity_size;
+ oobregion->length = ctx->parity_size;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int rtl_ecc_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
+ struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
+{
+ struct nand_device *nand = mtd_to_nanddev(mtd);
+ struct rtl_ecc_ctx *ctx = nand_to_ctx(nand);
+ int bbm;
+
+ if (section < 0 || section >= ctx->steps)
+ return -ERANGE;
+
+ /* reserve 2 BBM bytes in first block */
+ bbm = section ? 0 : 2;
+ oobregion->offset = section * RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE + bbm;
+ oobregion->length = RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE - bbm;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops rtl_ecc_ooblayout_ops = {
+ .ecc = rtl_ecc_ooblayout_ecc,
+ .free = rtl_ecc_ooblayout_free,
+};
+
+static void rtl_ecc_kick_engine(struct rtl_ecc_ctx *ctx, int operation)
+{
+ struct rtl_ecc_engine *rtlc = ctx->rtlc;
+
+ regmap_write(rtlc->regmap, RTL_ECC_CFG,
+ ctx->bch_mode | RTL_ECC_BURST_128 | RTL_ECC_DMA_PRECISE);
+
+ regmap_write(rtlc->regmap, RTL_ECC_DMA_START, rtlc->buf_dma);
+ regmap_write(rtlc->regmap, RTL_ECC_DMA_TAG, rtlc->buf_dma + RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE);
+ regmap_write(rtlc->regmap, RTL_ECC_DMA_TRIGGER, operation);
+}
+
+static int rtl_ecc_wait_for_engine(struct rtl_ecc_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ struct rtl_ecc_engine *rtlc = ctx->rtlc;
+ int ret, status, bitflips;
+ bool all_one;
+
+ /*
+ * The ECC engine needs 6-8 us to encode/decode a BCH6 syndrome for 512 bytes of data
+ * and 6 free bytes. In case the NAND area has been erased and all data and oob is
+ * set to 0xff, decoding takes 30us (reason unknown). Although the engine can trigger
+ * interrupts when finished, use active polling for now. 12 us maximum wait time has
+ * proven to be a good tradeoff between performance and overhead.
+ */
+
+ ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(rtlc->regmap, RTL_ECC_STATUS, status,
+ !(status & RTL_ECC_OP_STATUS), 12, 600);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = FIELD_GET(RTL_ECC_RESULT, status);
+ all_one = FIELD_GET(RTL_ECC_ALL_ONE, status);
+ bitflips = FIELD_GET(RTL_ECC_CORR_COUNT, status);
+
+ /* For erased blocks (all bits one) error status can be ignored */
+ if (ret && all_one)
+ ret = 0;
+
+ return ret ? -EBADMSG : bitflips;
+}
+
+static int rtl_ecc_run_engine(struct rtl_ecc_ctx *ctx, char *data, char *free,
+ char *parity, int operation)
+{
+ struct rtl_ecc_engine *rtlc = ctx->rtlc;
+ char *buf_parity = rtlc->buf + RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE + RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE;
+ char *buf_free = rtlc->buf + RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE;
+ char *buf_data = rtlc->buf;
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&rtlc->lock);
+
+ memcpy(buf_data, data, RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE);
+ memcpy(buf_free, free, RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE);
+ memcpy(buf_parity, parity, ctx->parity_size);
+
+ dma_sync_single_for_device(rtlc->dev, rtlc->buf_dma, RTL_ECC_DMA_SIZE, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+ rtl_ecc_kick_engine(ctx, operation);
+ ret = rtl_ecc_wait_for_engine(ctx);
+ dma_sync_single_for_cpu(rtlc->dev, rtlc->buf_dma, RTL_ECC_DMA_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+
+ if (ret >= 0) {
+ memcpy(data, buf_data, RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE);
+ memcpy(free, buf_free, RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE);
+ memcpy(parity, buf_parity, ctx->parity_size);
+ }
+
+ mutex_unlock(&rtlc->lock);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int rtl_ecc_prepare_io_req(struct nand_device *nand, struct nand_page_io_req *req)
+{
+ struct rtl_ecc_engine *rtlc = nand_to_rtlc(nand);
+ struct rtl_ecc_ctx *ctx = nand_to_ctx(nand);
+ char *data, *free, *parity;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (req->mode == MTD_OPS_RAW)
+ return 0;
+
+ nand_ecc_tweak_req(&ctx->req_ctx, req);
+
+ if (req->type == NAND_PAGE_READ)
+ return 0;
+
+ free = req->oobbuf.in;
+ data = req->databuf.in;
+ parity = req->oobbuf.in + ctx->steps * RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < ctx->steps; i++) {
+ ret |= rtl_ecc_run_engine(ctx, data, free, parity, RTL_ECC_OP_ENCODE);
+
+ free += RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE;
+ data += RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE;
+ parity += ctx->parity_size;
+ }
+
+ if (unlikely(ret))
+ dev_dbg(rtlc->dev, "ECC calculation failed\n");
+
+ return ret ? -EBADMSG : 0;
+}
+
+static int rtl_ecc_finish_io_req(struct nand_device *nand, struct nand_page_io_req *req)
+{
+ struct rtl_ecc_engine *rtlc = nand_to_rtlc(nand);
+ struct rtl_ecc_ctx *ctx = nand_to_ctx(nand);
+ struct mtd_info *mtd = nanddev_to_mtd(nand);
+ char *data, *free, *parity;
+ bool failure = false;
+ int bitflips = 0;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (req->mode == MTD_OPS_RAW)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (req->type == NAND_PAGE_WRITE) {
+ nand_ecc_restore_req(&ctx->req_ctx, req);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ free = req->oobbuf.in;
+ data = req->databuf.in;
+ parity = req->oobbuf.in + ctx->steps * RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE;
+
+ for (int i = 0 ; i < ctx->steps; i++) {
+ ret = rtl_ecc_run_engine(ctx, data, free, parity, RTL_ECC_OP_DECODE);
+
+ if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
+ failure = true;
+ mtd->ecc_stats.failed ++;
+ } else {
+ mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += ret;
+ bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, bitflips, ret);
+ }
+
+ free += RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE;
+ data += RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE;
+ parity += ctx->parity_size;
+ }
+
+ nand_ecc_restore_req(&ctx->req_ctx, req);
+
+ if (unlikely(failure))
+ dev_dbg(rtlc->dev, "ECC correction failed\n");
+ else if (unlikely(bitflips > 2))
+ dev_dbg(rtlc->dev, "%d bitflips detected\n", bitflips);
+
+ return failure ? -EBADMSG : bitflips;
+}
+
+static int rtl_ecc_check_support(struct nand_device *nand)
+{
+ struct mtd_info *mtd = nanddev_to_mtd(nand);
+ struct device *dev = nand->ecc.engine->dev;
+
+ if (mtd->oobsize != RTL_ECC_ALLOWED_OOB_SIZE ||
+ mtd->writesize != RTL_ECC_ALLOWED_PAGE_SIZE) {
+ dev_err(dev, "only flash geometry data=%d, oob=%d supported\n",
+ RTL_ECC_ALLOWED_PAGE_SIZE, RTL_ECC_ALLOWED_OOB_SIZE);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (nand->ecc.user_conf.algo != NAND_ECC_ALGO_BCH ||
+ nand->ecc.user_conf.strength != RTL_ECC_ALLOWED_STRENGTH ||
+ nand->ecc.user_conf.placement != NAND_ECC_PLACEMENT_OOB ||
+ nand->ecc.user_conf.step_size != RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE) {
+ dev_err(dev, "only algo=bch, strength=%d, placement=oob, step=%d supported\n",
+ RTL_ECC_ALLOWED_STRENGTH, RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int rtl_ecc_init_ctx(struct nand_device *nand)
+{
+ struct nand_ecc_props *conf = &nand->ecc.ctx.conf;
+ struct rtl_ecc_engine *rtlc = nand_to_rtlc(nand);
+ struct mtd_info *mtd = nanddev_to_mtd(nand);
+ int strength = nand->ecc.user_conf.strength;
+ struct device *dev = nand->ecc.engine->dev;
+ struct rtl_ecc_ctx *ctx;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = rtl_ecc_check_support(nand);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ctx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!ctx)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ nand->ecc.ctx.priv = ctx;
+ mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &rtl_ecc_ooblayout_ops);
+
+ conf->algo = NAND_ECC_ALGO_BCH;
+ conf->strength = strength;
+ conf->step_size = RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE;
+ conf->engine_type = NAND_ECC_ENGINE_TYPE_ON_HOST;
+
+ ctx->rtlc = rtlc;
+ ctx->steps = mtd->writesize / RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE;
+ ctx->bch_mode = strength == 6 ? RTL_ECC_BCH6 : RTL_ECC_BCH12;
+ ctx->parity_size = strength == 6 ? RTL_ECC_PARITY_SIZE_BCH6 : RTL_ECC_PARITY_SIZE_BCH12;
+
+ ret = nand_ecc_init_req_tweaking(&ctx->req_ctx, nand);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ dev_dbg(dev, "using bch%d with geometry data=%dx%d, free=%dx6, parity=%dx%d",
+ conf->strength, ctx->steps, conf->step_size,
+ ctx->steps, ctx->steps, ctx->parity_size);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void rtl_ecc_cleanup_ctx(struct nand_device *nand)
+{
+ struct rtl_ecc_ctx *ctx = nand_to_ctx(nand);
+
+ if (ctx)
+ nand_ecc_cleanup_req_tweaking(&ctx->req_ctx);
+}
+
+static struct nand_ecc_engine_ops rtl_ecc_engine_ops = {
+ .init_ctx = rtl_ecc_init_ctx,
+ .cleanup_ctx = rtl_ecc_cleanup_ctx,
+ .prepare_io_req = rtl_ecc_prepare_io_req,
+ .finish_io_req = rtl_ecc_finish_io_req,
+};
+
+static int rtl_ecc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ struct rtl_ecc_engine *rtlc;
+ void __iomem *base;
+ int ret;
+
+ rtlc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rtlc), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!rtlc)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(base))
+ return PTR_ERR(base);
+
+ ret = devm_mutex_init(dev, &rtlc->lock);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ rtlc->regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &rtl_ecc_regmap_config);
+ if (IS_ERR(rtlc->regmap))
+ return PTR_ERR(rtlc->regmap);
+
+ /*
+ * Focus on simplicity and use a preallocated DMA buffer for data exchange with the
+ * engine. For now make it a noncoherent memory model as invalidating/flushing caches
+ * is faster than reading/writing uncached memory on the known architectures.
+ */
+
+ rtlc->buf = dma_alloc_noncoherent(dev, RTL_ECC_DMA_SIZE, &rtlc->buf_dma,
+ DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (IS_ERR(rtlc->buf))
+ return PTR_ERR(rtlc->buf);
+
+ rtlc->dev = dev;
+ rtlc->engine.dev = dev;
+ rtlc->engine.ops = &rtl_ecc_engine_ops;
+ rtlc->engine.integration = NAND_ECC_ENGINE_INTEGRATION_EXTERNAL;
+
+ nand_ecc_register_on_host_hw_engine(&rtlc->engine);
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtlc);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void rtl_ecc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct rtl_ecc_engine *rtlc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ nand_ecc_unregister_on_host_hw_engine(&rtlc->engine);
+ dma_free_noncoherent(rtlc->dev, RTL_ECC_DMA_SIZE, rtlc->buf, rtlc->buf_dma,
+ DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id rtl_ecc_of_ids[] = {
+ {
+ .compatible = "realtek,rtl9301-ecc",
+ },
+ { /* sentinel */ },
+};
+
+static struct platform_driver rtl_ecc_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "rtl-nand-ecc-engine",
+ .of_match_table = rtl_ecc_of_ids,
+ },
+ .probe = rtl_ecc_probe,
+ .remove = rtl_ecc_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(rtl_ecc_driver);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Markus Stockhausen <markus.stockhausen@gmx.de>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Realtek NAND hardware ECC controller");
--
2.47.0
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: Add realtek,rtl9301-ecc
2025-08-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: Add realtek,rtl9301-ecc Markus Stockhausen
@ 2025-09-01 5:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-10 8:45 ` Miquel Raynal
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2025-09-01 5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Stockhausen
Cc: miquel.raynal, richard, vigneshr, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt,
linux-mtd, devicetree
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 10:34:07AM -0400, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
> Add a dtschema for the ECC engine on the Realtek RTL93xx SoCs.
> The engine supports BCH6 and BCH12 parity for 512 byte blocks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Stockhausen <markus.stockhausen@gmx.de>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - change cells from 2 to 1 (only 32 bit hardware)
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: realtek-ecc: Add Realtek external ECC engine support
2025-08-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: realtek-ecc: Add Realtek external ECC engine support Markus Stockhausen
@ 2025-09-10 8:43 ` Miquel Raynal
2025-09-10 15:48 ` AW: " markus.stockhausen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2025-09-10 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Stockhausen
Cc: richard, vigneshr, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt, linux-mtd, devicetree
Hello Markus,
On 28/08/2025 at 10:34:08 -04, Markus Stockhausen <markus.stockhausen@gmx.de> wrote:
> The Realtek RTl93xx switch SoC series has a built in ECC controller
> that can provide BCH6 or BCH12 over 512 data and 6 tag bytes. It
> generates 10 (BCH6) or 20 (BCH12) bytes of parity.
>
> This engine will most likely work in conjunction with the Realtek
> spi-mem based NAND controller but can work on its own. Therefore
> the initial implementation will be of type external.
>
> Remark! The engine can support any data blocks that are multiples
> of 512 bytes. For now limit it to data+oob layouts that have been
> analyzed from existing devices. This way it keeps compatibility
> and pre-existing vendor data can be read.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Stockhausen <markus.stockhausen@gmx.de>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - include bitfield.h
> - fill mtd->ecc_stats.corrected
> - Reduce chattiness with dev_dbg()
> - Convert return codes from context based to function based
> - Add more documentation about vendor specifications
> - Convert variables from vendor style to kernel style (e.g. tag)
Thanks for the changes, a few more comments and we'll be good.
...
> + * Altogether this gives currently the following block layout.
> + *
> + * +------+------+------+------+-----+------+------+------+------+-----+-----+-----+-----+
> + * | 512 | 512 | 512 | 512 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
> + * +------+------+------+------+-----+------+------+------+------+-----+-----+-----+-----+
> + * | data | data | data | data | BBI | free | free | free | free | ECC | ECC | ECC | ECC |
> + * +------+------+------+------+-----+------+------+------+------+-----+-----+-----+-----+
Thanks, very informative.
...
> +static int rtl_ecc_wait_for_engine(struct rtl_ecc_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + struct rtl_ecc_engine *rtlc = ctx->rtlc;
> + int ret, status, bitflips;
> + bool all_one;
> +
> + /*
> + * The ECC engine needs 6-8 us to encode/decode a BCH6 syndrome for 512 bytes of data
> + * and 6 free bytes. In case the NAND area has been erased and all data and oob is
> + * set to 0xff, decoding takes 30us (reason unknown). Although the engine can trigger
> + * interrupts when finished, use active polling for now. 12 us maximum wait time has
> + * proven to be a good tradeoff between performance and overhead.
> + */
> +
> + ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(rtlc->regmap, RTL_ECC_STATUS, status,
> + !(status & RTL_ECC_OP_STATUS), 12, 600);
Polling delay matters, but if you reach the timeout you're already in a
faulty situation so the responsiveness is less a concern in this
situation. I fear if the machine is loaded and if the triggers get
delayed somehow you might easily reach the timeout. In general I'd
advocate in favour of a default 1s timeout.
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = FIELD_GET(RTL_ECC_RESULT, status);
> + all_one = FIELD_GET(RTL_ECC_ALL_ONE, status);
Maybe you should check whether all_one remains true if there are
correctable bitflips in your buffer (you may use nandflipbits for that
purpose). If not, you shall probably spend extra time when checking for
ret checking if there are less bitflips than the ECC controller can
correct compared to ones in the *entire* buffer, which would indicate
that you are really in the presence of an erased page, see:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16.5/source/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c#L2841
This helper may be moved if you need it.
> + bitflips = FIELD_GET(RTL_ECC_CORR_COUNT, status);
> +
> + /* For erased blocks (all bits one) error status can be ignored */
> + if (ret && all_one)
Can be simplified?
if (all_one)
ret = 0;
> + ret = 0;
> +
> + return ret ? -EBADMSG : bitflips;
> +}
> +
> +static int rtl_ecc_run_engine(struct rtl_ecc_ctx *ctx, char *data, char *free,
> + char *parity, int operation)
> +{
> + struct rtl_ecc_engine *rtlc = ctx->rtlc;
> + char *buf_parity = rtlc->buf + RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE + RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE;
> + char *buf_free = rtlc->buf + RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE;
> + char *buf_data = rtlc->buf;
> + int ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&rtlc->lock);
> +
> + memcpy(buf_data, data, RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE);
> + memcpy(buf_free, free, RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE);
> + memcpy(buf_parity, parity, ctx->parity_size);
> +
> + dma_sync_single_for_device(rtlc->dev, rtlc->buf_dma, RTL_ECC_DMA_SIZE, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + rtl_ecc_kick_engine(ctx, operation);
> + ret = rtl_ecc_wait_for_engine(ctx);
> + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(rtlc->dev, rtlc->buf_dma, RTL_ECC_DMA_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +
> + if (ret >= 0) {
> + memcpy(data, buf_data, RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE);
> + memcpy(free, buf_free, RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE);
> + memcpy(parity, buf_parity, ctx->parity_size);
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&rtlc->lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int rtl_ecc_prepare_io_req(struct nand_device *nand, struct nand_page_io_req *req)
> +{
> + struct rtl_ecc_engine *rtlc = nand_to_rtlc(nand);
> + struct rtl_ecc_ctx *ctx = nand_to_ctx(nand);
> + char *data, *free, *parity;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (req->mode == MTD_OPS_RAW)
> + return 0;
> +
> + nand_ecc_tweak_req(&ctx->req_ctx, req);
> +
> + if (req->type == NAND_PAGE_READ)
> + return 0;
> +
> + free = req->oobbuf.in;
> + data = req->databuf.in;
> + parity = req->oobbuf.in + ctx->steps * RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE;
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < ctx->steps; i++) {
> + ret |= rtl_ecc_run_engine(ctx, data, free, parity, RTL_ECC_OP_ENCODE);
> +
> + free += RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE;
> + data += RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE;
> + parity += ctx->parity_size;
> + }
> +
> + if (unlikely(ret))
> + dev_dbg(rtlc->dev, "ECC calculation failed\n");
> +
> + return ret ? -EBADMSG : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rtl_ecc_finish_io_req(struct nand_device *nand, struct nand_page_io_req *req)
> +{
> + struct rtl_ecc_engine *rtlc = nand_to_rtlc(nand);
> + struct rtl_ecc_ctx *ctx = nand_to_ctx(nand);
> + struct mtd_info *mtd = nanddev_to_mtd(nand);
> + char *data, *free, *parity;
> + bool failure = false;
> + int bitflips = 0;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (req->mode == MTD_OPS_RAW)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (req->type == NAND_PAGE_WRITE) {
> + nand_ecc_restore_req(&ctx->req_ctx, req);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + free = req->oobbuf.in;
> + data = req->databuf.in;
> + parity = req->oobbuf.in + ctx->steps * RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE;
> +
> + for (int i = 0 ; i < ctx->steps; i++) {
> + ret = rtl_ecc_run_engine(ctx, data, free, parity, RTL_ECC_OP_DECODE);
> +
> + if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
> + failure = true;
> + mtd->ecc_stats.failed ++;
Extra space ^
> + } else {
> + mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += ret;
> + bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, bitflips, ret);
> + }
> +
> + free += RTL_ECC_FREE_SIZE;
> + data += RTL_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE;
> + parity += ctx->parity_size;
> + }
> +
> + nand_ecc_restore_req(&ctx->req_ctx, req);
> +
> + if (unlikely(failure))
> + dev_dbg(rtlc->dev, "ECC correction failed\n");
> + else if (unlikely(bitflips > 2))
> + dev_dbg(rtlc->dev, "%d bitflips detected\n", bitflips);
> +
> + return failure ? -EBADMSG : bitflips;
> +}
Rest lgtm.
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: Add realtek,rtl9301-ecc
2025-08-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: Add realtek,rtl9301-ecc Markus Stockhausen
2025-09-01 5:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2025-09-10 8:45 ` Miquel Raynal
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2025-09-10 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Stockhausen
Cc: richard, vigneshr, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt, linux-mtd, devicetree
Hello,
On 28/08/2025 at 10:34:07 -04, Markus Stockhausen <markus.stockhausen@gmx.de> wrote:
> Add a dtschema for the ECC engine on the Realtek RTL93xx SoCs.
> The engine supports BCH6 and BCH12 parity for 512 byte blocks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Stockhausen <markus.stockhausen@gmx.de>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - change cells from 2 to 1 (only 32 bit hardware)
> ---
> .../bindings/mtd/realtek,rtl9301-ecc.yaml | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/realtek,rtl9301-ecc.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/realtek,rtl9301-ecc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/realtek,rtl9301-ecc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1b34d79007a4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/realtek,rtl9301-ecc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mtd/realtek,rtl9301-ecc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Realtek SoCs NAND ECC engine
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Markus Stockhausen <markus.stockhausen@gmx.de>
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: realtek,rtl9301-ecc
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
This controller has an interrupt which must be described. It does not
matter if you use it or not for performance reasons in the driver. Just
don't mark it required below.
Also, no clocks seems suspicious. But maybe they are "hidden".
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* AW: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: realtek-ecc: Add Realtek external ECC engine support
2025-09-10 8:43 ` Miquel Raynal
@ 2025-09-10 15:48 ` markus.stockhausen
2025-09-10 16:00 ` Miquel Raynal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: markus.stockhausen @ 2025-09-10 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Miquel Raynal'; +Cc: richard, vigneshr, linux-mtd
> Von: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. September 2025 10:43
>
> > + ret = FIELD_GET(RTL_ECC_RESULT, status);
> > + all_one = FIELD_GET(RTL_ECC_ALL_ONE, status);
>
> Maybe you should check whether all_one remains true if there are
> correctable bitflips in your buffer (you may use nandflipbits for that
> purpose). If not, you shall probably spend extra time when checking for
> ret checking if there are less bitflips than the ECC controller can
> correct compared to ones in the *entire* buffer, which would indicate
> that you are really in the presence of an erased page, see:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16.5/source/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c#L2841
>
> This helper may be moved if you need it.
ECC engine cannot handle bitflips in erased blocks.
Seems as this helper really can increase robustness
in this case. I will make use of it in the next version.
What do you mean by "can be moved"?
Markus
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: AW: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: realtek-ecc: Add Realtek external ECC engine support
2025-09-10 15:48 ` AW: " markus.stockhausen
@ 2025-09-10 16:00 ` Miquel Raynal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2025-09-10 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: markus.stockhausen; +Cc: richard, vigneshr, linux-mtd
On 10/09/2025 at 17:48:20 +02, <markus.stockhausen@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Von: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. September 2025 10:43
>>
>> > + ret = FIELD_GET(RTL_ECC_RESULT, status);
>> > + all_one = FIELD_GET(RTL_ECC_ALL_ONE, status);
>>
>> Maybe you should check whether all_one remains true if there are
>> correctable bitflips in your buffer (you may use nandflipbits for that
>> purpose). If not, you shall probably spend extra time when checking for
>> ret checking if there are less bitflips than the ECC controller can
>> correct compared to ones in the *entire* buffer, which would indicate
>> that you are really in the presence of an erased page, see:
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16.5/source/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c#L2841
>>
>> This helper may be moved if you need it.
>
> ECC engine cannot handle bitflips in erased blocks.
> Seems as this helper really can increase robustness
> in this case. I will make use of it in the next version.
>
> What do you mean by "can be moved"?
It is part of the raw NAND subsystem and is not a NAND wide helper,
ie. it is not available for SPI NANDs nor NAND ECC engines. The herlper
is already device agnostic, so you might just need to moeve it out of
mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c. Perhaps you can put it into mtd/nand/core.c or
whatever other place you see fit.
Cheers,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-10 16:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-08-28 14:34 [PATCH v2 0/2] Realtek ECC engine Markus Stockhausen
2025-08-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: Add realtek,rtl9301-ecc Markus Stockhausen
2025-09-01 5:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-10 8:45 ` Miquel Raynal
2025-08-28 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: realtek-ecc: Add Realtek external ECC engine support Markus Stockhausen
2025-09-10 8:43 ` Miquel Raynal
2025-09-10 15:48 ` AW: " markus.stockhausen
2025-09-10 16:00 ` Miquel Raynal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox