From: "Joakim Tjernlund" <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
To: "'Anders Grafström'" <grfstrm@users.sourceforge.net>,
"'Jared Hulbert'" <jaredeh@gmail.com>,
"'Alexey Korolev'" <akorolev@infradead.org>,
"'Linux-MTD Mailing List'" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: cfi_cmdset_0001.c: Excessive erase suspends
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:01:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <017701c8a23e$fdd70b60$f9852220$@Tjernlund@transmode.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4809F7EC.9010808@users.sourceforge.net>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anders Grafström [mailto:grfstrm@users.sourceforge.net]
> Sent: den 19 april 2008 15:47
> To: Joakim Tjernlund; 'Jared Hulbert'; 'Alexey Korolev'; 'Linux-MTD Mailing List'
> Subject: Re: cfi_cmdset_0001.c: Excessive erase suspends
>
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Don't you need to check that the chip is suspended before you do any
> > new operation?
>
> You're right.
>
> Here's the improved version;
>
> static void erase_suspend(unsigned int loops)
> {
> volatile unsigned int *flash = (unsigned int *)0x41040000;
> unsigned int i;
> unsigned int suspends = 0;
> unsigned int words = 2;
> unsigned int timeout;
>
> /* Make sure there's something to erase */
> for (i = 0; i < 0x10000; i++) {
> if (flash[i] == 0xffffffff) {
> flash[i] = 0x00400040;
> flash[i] = 0;
> while ((flash[i] & 0x00800080) != 0x00800080);
> }
> }
>
> /* Clear status */
> flash[0] = 0x00500050;
>
> /* Erase */
> flash[0] = 0x00200020;
> flash[0] = 0x00d000d0;
>
> while (1) {
> /* Suspend */
> flash[0] = 0x00b000b0;
> flash[0] = 0x00700070;
> timeout = 100000;
> while ((flash[0] & 0x00800080) != 0x00800080 && --timeout);
> if (!timeout)
> printf("suspend timeout\n");
> suspends++;
>
> /* Short delay */
> for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++);
>
> /* Resume */
> flash[0] = 0x00d000d0;
> flash[0] = 0x00700070;
>
> /* Erase done ? */
> if ((flash[0] & 0x00800080) == 0x00800080) {
> printf("\nstatus %08x\n", flash[0]);
> break;
> }
>
> /* Short delay */
> for (i = 0; i < loops; i++);
> }
>
> /* Read array */
> flash[0] = 0x00ff00ff;
>
> /* Show the first 2 failed words */
> for (i = 0; i < 0x10000; i++) {
> if (flash[i] != 0xffffffff) {
> printf("%08x\n", flash[i]);
> if (--words == 0)
> break;
> }
> }
>
> printf("%d suspends\n", suspends);
> }
>
> void test_flash_erase_suspend(void)
> {
> unsigned int loops;
>
> for (loops = 6000; loops > 2000; loops -= 500) {
> printf("\n%d loops", loops);
> erase_suspend(loops);
> }
> }
>
>
> It produced this output at one occasion:
>
> 6000 loops
> status 00800080
> ffff0000
> ffff0000
> 4783 suspends
>
> 5500 loops
> status 00800080
> 5508 suspends
>
> 5000 loops
> status 008000a0
> 6394 suspends
>
> 4500 loops
> status 00a000a0
> fffffeff
> fffffffe
> 5169 suspends
>
> 4000 loops
> status 00a000a0
> fffffeff
> fffffeff
> 5378 suspends
>
> 3500 loops
> status 00a000a0
> aaaaaaaa
> aaaaaaaa
> 5715 suspends
>
> 3000 loops
> status 00a000a0
> 55555555
> 55555555
> 6142 suspends
>
> 2500 loops
> status 00a000a0
> 00000000
> 00000000
> 6929 suspends
>
> It locks up when I drop it down to 2000 or less iterations in the loop between resume and suspend.
> I think I need to do more testing with properly timed delays.
>
> Is there anything else that I have missed?
Perhaps, you should make "i" a volatile. That said I know that Intel
had erase suspend bugs in their early strata flash, thats why there is
a define in cmdset_0001 that disables them.
Maybe you got buggy chips?
oh, just remembered, strata chips needs to have a stable address bus before
CS is pulled. We had add a small delay on CS in the memory controller, otherwise
they would fail, especially when cold.
>
> /Anders
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-19 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-17 20:38 cfi_cmdset_0001.c: Excessive erase suspends Anders Grafström
2008-04-18 15:02 ` Alexey Korolev
2008-04-18 16:35 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-04-18 17:54 ` Jared Hulbert
2008-04-18 22:11 ` Anders Grafström
2008-04-19 2:47 ` Jared Hulbert
2008-04-19 9:18 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2008-04-19 13:47 ` Anders Grafström
2008-04-19 17:01 ` Joakim Tjernlund [this message]
2008-04-24 14:34 ` Alexey Korolev
2008-04-24 21:02 ` Anders Grafström
2008-04-25 9:59 ` Alexey Korolev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='017701c8a23e$fdd70b60$f9852220$@Tjernlund@transmode.se' \
--to=joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se \
--cc=akorolev@infradead.org \
--cc=grfstrm@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jaredeh@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox