From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from repulse.teligenthost.com ([207.155.249.3]) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 15F2HH-0006xn-00 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:29:51 +0100 From: "Bao C. Ha" To: "'kira brown'" , "'Simon Evans'" Cc: Subject: RE: Block device as MTD Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:32:54 -0700 Message-ID: <01ea01c0fe98$53bfd9a0$326c020a@SENSORIA> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Are there any journaling fs with compression besides JFFS2? I am primarily interested in the DOM and JFFS2 on DOC has made life barely bearable in the small footprint world. Thanks. Bao > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org > [mailto:linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org]On Behalf Of kira brown > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 4:12 PM > To: Simon Evans > Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: Block device as MTD > > > > > On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Simon Evans wrote: > > > If you are going to put a JFFS2 fs on the device, please note that > > it can take quite a while to mount because JFFS2 scans every block. > > A 96MB CF card took about 2 minutes. > > Why on eartl would you want to put JFFS on CF, when CF > provides all the > facilities that JFFS does already? You might as well put > ext3fs on it, > it'll be much faster. > > k. > > > ______________________________________________________ > Linux MTD discussion mailing list > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ >