From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from kynes.gatewest.net ([198.163.227.7]) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16RGwR-0008Ed-00 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:07:11 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Cam Mayor To: dennis.noermann@noernet.de Subject: Re: experience with max block erase Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:16:41 -0600 References: <135138262.1011228859807.JavaMail.root@boots> In-Reply-To: <135138262.1011228859807.JavaMail.root@boots> Cc: linux MTD mailing list MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0201171216410F.20372@kilauea.iders.ca> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Wednesday 16 January 2002 18:50, you wrote: > > "Each block can be independently erased 100,000 times" > > is this like the "food expiry date" ore "best before date" ? > (sorry i dont know the right englisch word , but i think you undertstan= d it > :) ) yes. _statistically_ it should work at least the advertised number of ti= mes.=20 after that, it may work, but they won't guarantee it. there is also a=20 nonzero chance that they'll stop working or degrade before that time, muc= h=20 like that jar of mayonnaise i had in the refrigerator that my wife forbad= e me=20 to eat anymore after she decided it was expired. cheers, cam