From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from natpost.webmailer.de ([192.67.198.65] helo=post.webmailer.de) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16WE0M-0005Eu-00 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:59:43 +0000 Received: from thomas (pD9EB8F59.dip.t-dialin.net [217.235.143.89]) by post.webmailer.de (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA07025 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:10:49 +0100 (MET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" From: Thomas Gleixner Reply-To: gleixner@autronix.de To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: compile errors on fs/jffs/inode-v23.c Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:13:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <02013111130007.00763@thomas> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Is there a real reason for the change in inode-v23.c at line 367 inode->i_rdev.value = 0; As far as I can see is inode->i_rdev neither a structure nor a union. I'm working on kernel 2.4.17. Is this a change for 2.5 ? Thomas __________________________________________________ Thomas Gleixner, autronix automation GmbH auf dem berg 3, d-88690 uhldingen-muehlhofen fon: +49 7556 919891 , fax: +49 7556 919886 mail: gleixner@autronix.de, http://www.autronix.de