From: Thomas.Gleixner@t-online.de (Thomas Gleixner)
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, gleixner@autronix.de
Cc: "Veli-Pekka Ylönen" <velpeyl@utu.fi>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, jffs-dev@axis.com
Subject: Re: NAND flash and JFFS(2)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 07:51:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02020707510901.00888@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202070847350.3680-100000@lapdancer.baythorne.internal>
On Wednesday, 6. February 2002 23:55, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> True - but in order to implement ECC we have to either write partial
> blocks _without_ ECC, until we fill the block and write the ECC data with
> the 512nd byte, or batch the writes into pages.
I mean we should keep the batch write. Thats correct. But we can leave the
cleanmarker where it is now and write it without ECC and put the rest of the
page with ECC. On small NAND devices we have only 8byte spare area per block.
We need 3 byte for ECC and at least 1 byte for flags. Then the cleanmarker
area is reduced to 4 bytes. Is that enough ?
> > Should i put them into CVS to jffs-nand-branch or send them by mail ?
> Mail's probably best at this stage - thanks.
I will send it in the afternoon
Thomas
__________________________________________________
Thomas Gleixner, autronix automation GmbH
auf dem berg 3, d-88690 uhldingen-muehlhofen
fon: +49 7556 919891 , fax: +49 7556 919886
mail: gleixner@autronix.de, http://www.autronix.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-07 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <02020523405103.11497@thomas>
2002-02-06 4:54 ` NAND flash and JFFS(2) David Woodhouse
2002-02-06 22:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2002-02-06 22:55 ` David Woodhouse
2002-02-07 6:51 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2002-02-07 7:04 ` David Woodhouse
2002-02-11 13:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2002-02-11 13:53 ` David Woodhouse
[not found] ` <0202121847440K.00764@thomas>
2002-02-13 11:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2002-02-13 20:03 Lance Nakamura
2002-02-13 20:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-11 23:42 Steve_Chen
2002-02-12 0:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2002-02-11 15:32 Thomas Gleixner
2002-02-11 15:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2002-02-11 19:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2002-02-05 14:41 Veli-Pekka Ylönen
2002-02-05 15:30 ` David Woodhouse
2002-02-05 17:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2002-02-05 21:18 ` David Woodhouse
2002-02-05 17:35 ` Veli-Pekka Ylönen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02020707510901.00888@thomas \
--to=thomas.gleixner@t-online.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gleixner@autronix.de \
--cc=jffs-dev@axis.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=velpeyl@utu.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox