From: Thomas Gleixner <gleixner@autronix.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, gleixner@autronix.de
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, jffs-dev@axis.com
Subject: Re: JFFS2 & NAND
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:48:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02021810483303.00860@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19529.1014024551@redhat.com>
On Monday, 18. February 2002 10:29, David Woodhouse wrote:
> gleixner@autronix.de said:
> > Yes inside JFFS2, but who tells the NAND driver, which layout to use.
>
> Do we really need the NAND driver to be able to use more than one layout?
>
> Either we have hardware ECC which determines the layout, or the NAND driver
> implements software ECC and gets to choose. Can't the filesystem just deal
> with the ECC layout used by the NAND driver, as determined by the
> underlying hardware?
Also hardware ECC does not determine the layout. It just builds the ECC, you
have to read it out of the CLPD and write it at a appropriate place in the
OOB area. Same on read.
We can use a fixed layout for every chip-type. There are 2 good reasons not
to do that.
1. The SMC DOS-FAT oob layout is more than ugly. To press our idea of oob
usage into this, is like you slice a bread in many small pieces to fit into
the subdivisions of your tupperbox, instead of rearanging the contents of the
box.
2. I don't want to put too much restrictions into the oob layout, so we would
make it hard for somebody, who want's to implement a different filesystem
than JFFS2.
--
Thomas
__________________________________________________
Thomas Gleixner, autronix automation GmbH
auf dem berg 3, d-88690 uhldingen-muehlhofen
fon: +49 7556 919891 , fax: +49 7556 919886
mail: gleixner@autronix.de, http://www.autronix.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-18 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-14 15:57 JFFS2 & NAND Thomas Gleixner
2002-02-14 17:22 ` Peter De Schrijver
2002-02-14 17:27 ` David Woodhouse
2002-02-14 17:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2002-02-17 9:51 ` David Woodhouse
2002-02-17 11:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2002-02-17 17:25 ` David Woodhouse
2002-02-17 19:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2002-02-18 8:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2002-02-18 8:46 ` David Woodhouse
2002-02-18 9:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2002-02-18 9:29 ` David Woodhouse
2002-02-18 9:48 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2002-02-18 16:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02021810483303.00860@thomas \
--to=gleixner@autronix.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jffs-dev@axis.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox