From: "Sudhakar Rajashekhara" <sudhakar.raj@ti.com>
To: "'Wolfram Sang'" <w.sang@pengutronix.de>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: 'Artem Bityutskiy' <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>,
davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH] nand/davinci: relax a timeout for ECC-initialization
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:42:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <030d01cb4b58$e18cafd0$a4a60f70$@raj@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1283510137-23573-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Hi Wolfram Sang,
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 16:05:37, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Sudhakar found out that 100us are enough. Sadly, his updated patch was
> overlooked and an older version still using 100ms was merged. Fix this.
>
> Reference: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/59180/
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com>
> Cc: Sneha Narnakaje <nsnehaprabha@ti.com>
> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
> ---
>
> Artem, if you pick up this one, too, then we have what Sudhakar sent as
> v3 of his original patch. Except for some minor rewording in the comment.
>
> Sudhakar, I hope it is okay if I send this patch now. I just want to have
> the confusion about the different versions gone.
I was tied up for the past few days, so couldn't work on this patch. Thanks
for taking this up. Can you modify the comment also to match my patch and
re-submit this again?
Thanks,
Sudhakar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-03 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-25 12:18 [RFC] nand/davinci: Fix comment to match the code Wolfram Sang
2010-08-25 12:27 ` Sudhakar Rajashekhara
2010-08-25 12:55 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-08-25 13:30 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-08-26 3:59 ` Sudhakar Rajashekhara
2010-08-26 6:23 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-09-01 8:05 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-09-01 23:14 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-09-03 10:35 ` [PATCH] nand/davinci: relax a timeout for ECC-initialization Wolfram Sang
2010-09-03 11:12 ` Sudhakar Rajashekhara [this message]
2010-09-03 12:15 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-09-07 8:00 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='030d01cb4b58$e18cafd0$a4a60f70$@raj@ti.com' \
--to=sudhakar.raj@ti.com \
--cc=Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com \
--cc=davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).